Category Archives: science

Bussard? Bustard? Buzzard?

Say at some point the human race gets its act together and actually decides to send a spaceship to another star. We’ll say it’s unmanned because that makes everything so much easier; it’s just  a robot probe that’s intended to sate our curiosity about what Alpha Centauri actually bloody looks like, and so we don’t need any life support systems or generation ship malarkey going on. We’ll also say that getting the probe out of the Earth’s gravity well – aka the trickiest part of spaceflight – is similarly not an issue because we’re building it in orbit or something. This leaves us just one, fairly major problem: how do we make it go?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

The Quickfire Round.

Innokenti asks

 Why are observatories dome-shaped? They house a telescope… but why the dome? The things can swivel around and stuff without being encased in a dome. So what purpose does it serve?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors.

For the sake of my sanity, I’m just going to deal with this question which has been sitting in my inbox for the last two months.

Joe asks

What is your view on LFTR technology in general. What are the biggest obstacles holding it back? Does it have a real chance at being the number one energy provider?

Since LFTR technology would allow smaller and lighter reactor housing would it be cost effective to put LFTR technology in space?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Our Words Are Backed By Nuclear Weapons!

In which I’m going to do my damndest to get the West’s security services interested in my blog. Hi guys!

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

PWR Overwhelming.

Last week, how to do nuclear reactors wrong. This week, how to do nuclear reactors right. Or at least as right as possible.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

How Not To Build A Nuclear Reactor.


Today, children, we’re going to learn all about nuclear power plant safety physics. Or rather, about how nuclear power plants will kill you if you ignore safety physics. Are you sitting comfortably? Well too bad, I’m starting anyway.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

NUKULAR REEAKTOR FIZZICS.

Nuclear reactors, then. A good idea with pretty much the worst PR in the history of the planet, since when people hear the word “nuclear” they think of this or this or this or this, with little idea of what nuclear power generation is actually about. In light of the recent screw-up at Fukushima the politics surrounding nuclear power are fairly muddied and the future for it is uncertain, which is a bit of a shame because nuclear reactors are – if done correctly – actually a fairly neat way of fulfilling your country’s energy requirements.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,