<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Scientific Gamer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 15:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interstellar: A Rant by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/interstellar-a-rant/#comment-61522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 15:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4402#comment-61522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This movie was a huge disappointment. In the end, for me, it doesn&#039;t much matter how accurate the science is - no matter how thorough an attempt is made at accuracy, something like this has to contain a load of guesswork, and debated theories - I can get past all that for a good movie. 

But this just isn&#039;t a good movie. It&#039;s ponderous, with long stretches where we&#039;re meant to be sufficiently entertained by  intricate and well-done fireworks alone. There are long sequences where nothing is happening but a display of technical know how by the movie maker.  Yawn. 

Writing is so-so, plot is languid, characters are underdeveloped or boring, much of it is predictable - not even Michael Caine can save it. He&#039;s wasted, telling us over and over not to go gentle into that good night. 

The very beginning with the always great John Lithgow, and the rest of the family is the best part. The rest was a big - and much too long - letdown. So boring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie was a huge disappointment. In the end, for me, it doesn&#8217;t much matter how accurate the science is &#8211; no matter how thorough an attempt is made at accuracy, something like this has to contain a load of guesswork, and debated theories &#8211; I can get past all that for a good movie. </p>
<p>But this just isn&#8217;t a good movie. It&#8217;s ponderous, with long stretches where we&#8217;re meant to be sufficiently entertained by  intricate and well-done fireworks alone. There are long sequences where nothing is happening but a display of technical know how by the movie maker.  Yawn. </p>
<p>Writing is so-so, plot is languid, characters are underdeveloped or boring, much of it is predictable &#8211; not even Michael Caine can save it. He&#8217;s wasted, telling us over and over not to go gentle into that good night. </p>
<p>The very beginning with the always great John Lithgow, and the rest of the family is the best part. The rest was a big &#8211; and much too long &#8211; letdown. So boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts: Apex Legends by 5 Major Game Companies Saved by Their Own Small-Scale Hits - Thisisgame SEA</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-apex-legends/#comment-61521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[5 Major Game Companies Saved by Their Own Small-Scale Hits - Thisisgame SEA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 23:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5786#comment-61521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] scientificgamer [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] scientificgamer [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/about/#comment-61520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 05:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-61520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interstellar: A Rant by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/interstellar-a-rant/#comment-61510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4402#comment-61510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this is really old at this point but I finally just watched this jaw-droppingly bad movie, so I really appreciate this post. My friend who likes it asked why I couldn&#039;t just suspend disbelief like I do with movies about elves or vampires or something, and I couldn&#039;t find a way to phrase it, so I love what you wrote about hard and soft sci-fi here. No one comes out of Star Wars thinking light sabers are real, but there are now apparently thousands of Nolan fans who genuinely believe you could fly safely into a supermassive black hole, because red-shirt scientist in this movie said their event horizons are &quot;gentle.&quot; Failing to mention that they have infinite gravity,  and accretion discs 100x hotter than the sun, and interiors hovering just above absolute 0. There is no more inhospitable place for humans to &quot;construct&quot; a &quot;tesseract&quot; or whatever they&#039;re meant to have done. But then the movie needed them to fly into the black hole to &quot;solve the problem of gravity&quot; which is preventing human beings from leaving earth and traveling through the black hole -- to which I say: huh? Why is reconciling astrophysics and quantum mechanics required for evacuating humans from earth? Hey but fortunately the sassy robot is able to pull all the &quot;data&quot; he needs in about 5 minutes so Cooper can then transmit complex equations to his daughter using morse code delivered through the second hand of a watch. Are you *kidding* me? It&#039;s a disaster even without the Gargantua-sized bootstrap paradox plot hole (seriously Bill and Ted made more of an effort with the branching paths of linear time than this film did). Anyway I know I&#039;m preaching to the choir, it&#039;s just nice to find someone else in the universe who had the same response I did. (Perhaps I was DRAWN HERE by some UNQUANTIFIABLE FORCE we just DON&#039;T YET UNDERSTAND.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is really old at this point but I finally just watched this jaw-droppingly bad movie, so I really appreciate this post. My friend who likes it asked why I couldn&#8217;t just suspend disbelief like I do with movies about elves or vampires or something, and I couldn&#8217;t find a way to phrase it, so I love what you wrote about hard and soft sci-fi here. No one comes out of Star Wars thinking light sabers are real, but there are now apparently thousands of Nolan fans who genuinely believe you could fly safely into a supermassive black hole, because red-shirt scientist in this movie said their event horizons are &#8220;gentle.&#8221; Failing to mention that they have infinite gravity,  and accretion discs 100x hotter than the sun, and interiors hovering just above absolute 0. There is no more inhospitable place for humans to &#8220;construct&#8221; a &#8220;tesseract&#8221; or whatever they&#8217;re meant to have done. But then the movie needed them to fly into the black hole to &#8220;solve the problem of gravity&#8221; which is preventing human beings from leaving earth and traveling through the black hole &#8212; to which I say: huh? Why is reconciling astrophysics and quantum mechanics required for evacuating humans from earth? Hey but fortunately the sassy robot is able to pull all the &#8220;data&#8221; he needs in about 5 minutes so Cooper can then transmit complex equations to his daughter using morse code delivered through the second hand of a watch. Are you *kidding* me? It&#8217;s a disaster even without the Gargantua-sized bootstrap paradox plot hole (seriously Bill and Ted made more of an effort with the branching paths of linear time than this film did). Anyway I know I&#8217;m preaching to the choir, it&#8217;s just nice to find someone else in the universe who had the same response I did. (Perhaps I was DRAWN HERE by some UNQUANTIFIABLE FORCE we just DON&#8217;T YET UNDERSTAND.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts: Homeworld &#8211; Deserts of Kharak by &#187; TELEGRAM @SEO_LINKK_ORDER &#8211; SEO BACKLINKS, HOMEPAGE LINKS, CROSSLINKSTuTrabajoVirtual.com</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-homeworld-deserts-of-kharak/#comment-61509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; TELEGRAM @SEO_LINKK_ORDER &#8211; SEO BACKLINKS, HOMEPAGE LINKS, CROSSLINKSTuTrabajoVirtual.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4786#comment-61509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] TELEGRAM @SEO_LINKK_ORDER &#8211; SEO BACKLINKS, HOMEPAGE LINKS, CROSSLINKS [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] TELEGRAM @SEO_LINKK_ORDER &#8211; SEO BACKLINKS, HOMEPAGE LINKS, CROSSLINKS [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 End Of Year Retrospective. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/2013-end-of-year-retrospective/#comment-61508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=3842#comment-61508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 End Of Year Retrospective. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/2013-end-of-year-retrospective/#comment-61507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=3842#comment-61507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 End Of Year Retrospective. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/2013-end-of-year-retrospective/#comment-61506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=3842#comment-61506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2012 End Of Year Retrospective. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/2012-end-of-year-retrospective/#comment-61505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2720#comment-61505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2012 End Of Year Retrospective. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/2012-end-of-year-retrospective/#comment-61504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2720#comment-61504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
