I apologise in advance if this post doesn’t contain much science. As we’ve seen astronomy is mostly based around an astounding amount of ingenuity and bloody-mindedness backed up by not a small quantity of guesswork, but when it comes to dealing with questions like the Fermi Paradox we don’t even have enough information to make an educated guess. As a result things can start to get a little metaphysical, almost bordering on sci-fi at times.
As mentioned in the exoplanets post, one of the reasons we’re so interested in finding Earth-like planets around other stars is so that we’ll have more accurate terms to plug into the Drake Equation. Right now the number of intelligent civilizations we know of stands at one: us. Basing our assumptions of how likely intelligent civilizations are likely to evolve on other planets on this one example is a very bad idea, for the same reason that concluding all sheep in Scotland are black on the basis of seeing one black sheep in a field in Scotland would be really, really stupid. Unfortunately at the moment we just don’t have any other data; until we find more Earth-like planets we can’t even begin to constrain the probabilities down to something that’s not a complete shot in the dark.
But I’m getting ahead of myself. The Drake Equation is a semi-famous equation thought up by Frank Drake (duh) to describe how often intelligent civilizations is likely to evolve. I particularly like it because it doesn’t actually involve maths of any kind, instead being a shorthand way of describing the various factors we think would contribute to the evolution (or not) of sentient lifeforms. The equation runs as follows:
N = the number of civilizations currently existing in our galaxy that we might be able to talk to.
R* = the average rate of star formation in our galaxy.
fp = the fraction of those stars which go on to form planets.
ne = the fraction of those planets which are Earth-like planets capable of supporting life.
fl = the fraction of those Earth-like planets which go on to evolve life of some kind.
fi = the fraction of lifeforms which evolve into intelligent life of some kind.
fc = the fraction of intelligent lifeforms which develop the technology to start beaming communications signals out into space.
L = the average lifetime of a communicating civilization; i.e. how long they send out those signals for.
The reason we use the rate of star formation is because that’s easily multiplied by the lifetime to find the number of intelligent communicating civilizations currently existing. Say you have ten new stars being born each year. A certain fraction of those stars will have planets, of which a certain fraction be will Earth-like, of which a certain fraction will evolve life, of which a certain fraction will be intelligent life, of which a certain fraction will end up communicating. Multiply all terms except L together and you get the number of communicating civilizations coming into existence each year – this will be much lower than ten, say 0.007 civilizations per year. If these civilizations stick around for an average lifetime L of 1000 years each, then we can say there are 7 intelligent civilizations capable of communication existing in the Milky Way at any one time.
Now, of these terms we know roughly what R* is, and thanks to the exoplanet search we should eventually arrive at educated guesses for fp and ne. We have absolutely no idea what the other four terms should be. Even if we could use the Earth as an example it wouldn’t be a very good one, since on the one side you have the astronomers who argue that the assumption that Earth-like conditions are necessary for life is tainted by anthropic bias, while another side argues that there’s nothing particularly special about the Earth, while on yet another you have those who argue that the chances of another Earth existing are so incredibly remote that it’s not even worth considering as a possibility1. All the Earth tells us is that the final answer to the Drake Equation is greater than or equal to one.
As I said, though, the Drake Equation isn’t a real equation. Instead it’s more of a description, a way of formulating the argument and a talking point for astronomers and astrobiologists to argue over endlessly. It is, however, the most scientific treatment of the intelligent life problem that exists, and provides a framework for me to talk about some of the theories as to why we haven’t been contacted by any little green men just yet.
Some numbers. The universe is 13.7 billion years old. Stars began to form a few hundred thousand years after the Big Bang; second generation stars with the heavy elements necessary for rocky terrestrial planets would have started to form a from a few hundred million up to a billion years after that. A decent guesstimate would be that the galaxy has been capable of supporting the evolution of life for about 10 billion years.
This presents us with a bit of a dichotomy when we look at the Earth. The Sun formed about 4.7 billion years ago, with the Earth coalescing together out of the leftovers 4 billion years ago and the first evolution of microbial life taking place (we think) about a billion years after that. It would be foolish in the extreme to assume that we are the first intelligent civilization to evolve in our galaxy; the Milky Way consists of about 200 billion stars, any one of which could have produced an intelligent alien civilization with a head-start of up to five billion years on us2. After five billion years of evolution the galaxy should be teeming with intelligent civilizations. Back in 1950 Enrico Fermi was having lunch with some colleagues at Los Alamos when he asked the following question: if the galaxy is so jam-packed with intelligent life, then where are they?
Fermi was a very intelligent man, and so this isn’t anywhere near as naïve a question as it sounds. Everyone knows that faster-than-light travel is an impossibility given those pesky laws of physics, so a visit by an alien race in person is pretty much out of the question. Even communication via radio signals/lasers/whatever is unlikely if you assume a fairly low population density, since any signal crossing the thousands of light years separating civilizations would be preposterously faint once it reached us. None of this matters, though, because of a little concept called the von Neumann probe.
Assume there is an alien civilization that really wants to explore the galaxy and contact its neighbours. Assume that they have a level of technology that is just a few hundred years in advance of our own, and assume that they’re not particularly bothered about waiting around for a few million years to find out the result. If all these things are true then it would be perfectly possible to explore the galaxy using a von Neumann probe. This is an entirely autonomous, robotic, self-replicating space probe that is sent towards the nearest star at sub-light speeds. It takes several hundred years to get there. When it arrives, the first thing it does is look around for a handy source of raw material – say an asteroid, or even a planet – with which it can build two or more new von Neumann probes. These new von Neumann probes then set out for other close-by star systems, and when they get there they repeat the exact same process; one probe becomes two, two probes become four, four probes become eight and so on. This results in a wave of von-Neumann probes spreading throughout the galaxy exponentially so even though they’re doing it very slowly they can explore the entire thing in the time it takes for one probe to cross the Milky Way from end to end, which is estimated as being not more than a few hundred million years.
This makes interstellar exploration very very easy for a civilization in possession of the required level of technology; the only effort required is that to send out just one probe (maybe two or three for redundancy since the first probe is the most vulnerable point in the von Neumann chain) and then sit back and await the results. The von Neumann concept therefore presents us with an unpleasant paradox because it essentially makes the result of the Drake Equation independent of L, the lifetime of the communicating civilization. Assuming the civilization lasts long enough to launch the probe in the first place then it wouldn’t matter if their planet got hit by an asteroid or their sun went nova or they blew themselves up with nuclear weapons; the von Neumann probes are completely autonomous and will carry on exploring the galaxy long after the civilization that launched them has died out. So given the assumptions that other intelligent civilizations would have evolved hundreds of millions to billions of years before the human race, that some of these civilizations would have had a psychology that both led them to want to explore the galaxy and communicate with other civilizations and which let them come up with the idea of the von Neumann probe, and that at least one of them survived long enough to launch it, then there should, somewhere in our Solar System, be an ancient von Neumann probe broadcasting the galactic equivalent of “Hi! How are you?” That there is not means either that intelligent life is much rarer than we suppose, or that there is some common factor that prevents a civilization from launching a von Neumann probe in the first place.
Some of the latter explanations are more than a little fanciful. The most plausible is something called the Great Filter; this holds that there is some unknown factor in the Drake Equation with a very low value that stops the vast majority of intelligent life from progressing further down the chain. In the case of human civilization we are either one of the very few civilizations to get over this hump (unlikely given the Copernican principle) or else we have yet to encounter it, which is a somewhat depressing thought. Perhaps civilizations exhaust their resources before they get to the point of being able to launch a probe. Perhaps they blow themselves up. Perhaps they get hit by a giant space rock. It could be anything with the capacity to take out an entire planet’s worth of sentient life in one fell swoop.
Then you have theories advanced by people who have been watching too much sci-fi, most popular of which is the Zoo Hypothesis. This holds that there is a community of advanced extraterrestrial civilizations out here, but that they’re governed by something similar to Star Trek’s Prime Directive and that they not allowed to interfere or communicate with less-advanced lifeforms. I find this somewhat unlikely to say the least – where are the Klingons? Or the Borg? Even if this were true we’d still have seen some sign of alien life, albeit probably in the form of a vast Independence Day-style invasion fleet that wants to strip our planet of everything valuable. Other explanations involve the alien civilizations experiencing a technological singularity and undergoing a process similar to Sublimation in Iain M. Banks’ Culture novels whereby they simply no longer give a shit about mundane physical things, or else that we have been contacted by extraterrestrial life and that it’s being hushed up by national governments.
You can find all these crackpot theories and more on Wikipedia’s Fermi Paradox page, but at the end of the day the question of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations is, while interesting, ultimately an excuse for scientists (and everyone else) to avoid doing any science by blowing a lot of hot air. All that really matters is that we haven’t yet found anyone else out there, and that this state of affairs is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
- I read the Rare Earth book as part of the research for my third year undergraduate dissertation. I didn’t find it particularly convincing; when the assumption that the Copernican theory holds true forms one of the cornerstones of modern cosmology you can’t just throw it out the window the way these guys did.
- I am pretty much pulling some of these numbers out of my ass, but they’re so big that what the real answer is doesn’t really matter: the point is that the Earth has gotten around to forming intelligent life reasonably late in the grand scheme of things and that there must have been intelligent civilizations that came before us.
Yeah. I am supremely unbothered by the extraterrestrial life question. It’s just… well, yes or no, doesn’t really matter. If we get there, we do, if not… I think there’s enough of us around not to be lonely.
It doesn’t really matter? What? If SETI turned round tomorrow and said they’d just had a conversation with ET and they seemed very nice and wanted to pop across for a visit, you’d just shrug your shoulders and say it doesn’t really matter?
Until that happens it really REALLY doesn’t matter. And should it happen… it will almost certainly matter very little because of the intergalactic issues as stated above.
KENTIIIII. Intergalactic =/= interstellar!
Go away science boy.
“or else we have yet to encounter it, which is a somewhat depressing thought.”
See, that excites me. I would love to be around for the end of human race just to see how it happens. I figure that once I’m dead the furthering of the human race won’t mean much to me and if we go out with a bang I’d much rather be a part of it.
SOME MEN JUST WANT TO WATCH THE WORLD BURN.
I could happily be a Bond villain with no stupid motive like stealing all the gold/oil/water/girls. I mean, I’d probably cover it up with some guff about humans not being worthy and the planet being better off without us but really I’d just like to try to blow the world up just to see if I could.
It’s probably why I find myself mostly siding with the super villains in films.
Perhaps everyone who dies actually goes to an enormous theatre in the afterlife getting ready to see the end of mankind? With popcorn and enormous bottles of pop.
That sounds horrible. The worst thing about the theatre/cinema is everyone else there eating and talking and kicking the back of my seat. I couldn’t imagine how bad it would be if everyone that had ever died was there. I would require my own room. And a big button to press that starts the end of the world.
“the Earth tells us is that the final answer to the Drake Equation is greater than or equal to one.”
Untrue. The Drake Equation merely tells us the average number of civilizations capable of intergalactic communication. It is possible that N << 1 and the galaxy spends most of its existence unobserved by civilizations.
What you really mean is that the Drake Equation must be greater or equal to zero.
I correct myself. The Drake Equation must be greater than (but not equal to) zero.
Fair point. At the moment it’s one. When the human race dies out, it could drop to zero. Woolly thinking on my part.