<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Tribes Ascend.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-tribes-ascend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-tribes-ascend/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-tribes-ascend/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1291#comment-437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also paid £7 for the VIP account; I had enough fun with Tribes that I had no problem throwing a bit of cash the developer&#039;s way. I don&#039;t think much of the game&#039;s long-term prospects, though. I can&#039;t help feeling that this paradigm of ensuring people keep forking out for whatever the current weapon de jour is is poisoning the well a bit, although I suspect that whatever hard data F2P companies gather proves me wrong or they wouldn&#039;t keep using it as a business model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also paid £7 for the VIP account; I had enough fun with Tribes that I had no problem throwing a bit of cash the developer&#8217;s way. I don&#8217;t think much of the game&#8217;s long-term prospects, though. I can&#8217;t help feeling that this paradigm of ensuring people keep forking out for whatever the current weapon de jour is is poisoning the well a bit, although I suspect that whatever hard data F2P companies gather proves me wrong or they wouldn&#8217;t keep using it as a business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton K</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-tribes-ascend/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1291#comment-436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m enjoying the game quite a bit myself, but I do see your point. I agree that the XP prices are ridiculous and I&#039;m a little worried for how this game will evolve regarding new weapons, etc. Still, I put in the minimum of 9.99$ to get the VIP account and now amass XP pretty quickly. Sure, I spend a few bucks on a free to play game, but it&#039;s a small price to pay for such a gem in my opinion. Great article by the way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m enjoying the game quite a bit myself, but I do see your point. I agree that the XP prices are ridiculous and I&#8217;m a little worried for how this game will evolve regarding new weapons, etc. Still, I put in the minimum of 9.99$ to get the VIP account and now amass XP pretty quickly. Sure, I spend a few bucks on a free to play game, but it&#8217;s a small price to pay for such a gem in my opinion. Great article by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-tribes-ascend/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1291#comment-435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing is free to play games are never going to be acts of altruism. They have to run on this imbalanced model; they can&#039;t survive if there&#039;s no way for them to induce people to spend money. Free to play is therefore a bit of a misnomer because it obfuscates the true intent of the game. It&#039;s free in the same way that supermarket loss-leaders are cheap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is free to play games are never going to be acts of altruism. They have to run on this imbalanced model; they can&#8217;t survive if there&#8217;s no way for them to induce people to spend money. Free to play is therefore a bit of a misnomer because it obfuscates the true intent of the game. It&#8217;s free in the same way that supermarket loss-leaders are cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jiiiiim</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-tribes-ascend/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jiiiiim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1291#comment-434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can never decide if I like the F2P model or not. On the plus side, it&#039;s free, on the downside, there&#039;s the potential for massive imbalance. I suppose I can&#039;t really think of a game that runs on F2P that I actually like, apart from TF2. There&#039;s plenty that are successful but god they&#039;re depressing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can never decide if I like the F2P model or not. On the plus side, it&#8217;s free, on the downside, there&#8217;s the potential for massive imbalance. I suppose I can&#8217;t really think of a game that runs on F2P that I actually like, apart from TF2. There&#8217;s plenty that are successful but god they&#8217;re depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
