<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Ticket To Ride.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts: Through The Ages &#124; The Scientific Gamer</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/#comment-54862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thoughts: Through The Ages &#124; The Scientific Gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1444#comment-54862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] right kind of boardgame for one of these ports. Years ago I bought the Ticket To Ride port &#8212; reviewed it on this very blog, in fact &#8212; and by removing the physicality of it and reducing it to a set of raw mechanics it [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] right kind of boardgame for one of these ports. Years ago I bought the Ticket To Ride port &#8212; reviewed it on this very blog, in fact &#8212; and by removing the physicality of it and reducing it to a set of raw mechanics it [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Hero Academy PC The Scientific Gamer</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Review: Hero Academy PC The Scientific Gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1444#comment-856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of two in terms of raw power. To be fair to Hero Academy it’s not the only iOS port to do this as Ticket to Ride had the same problem, but once you were over that initial barrier Ticket to Ride’s presentation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of two in terms of raw power. To be fair to Hero Academy it’s not the only iOS port to do this as Ticket to Ride had the same problem, but once you were over that initial barrier Ticket to Ride’s presentation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldschoolgameblog</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldschoolgameblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 19:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1444#comment-570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you thoughts concering Ticket to Ride. It is definitely best as a board-game. I wouldn&#039;t consider playing a digital version of it. It is best enjoyed at the kitchen/living-room table. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you thoughts concering Ticket to Ride. It is definitely best as a board-game. I wouldn&#8217;t consider playing a digital version of it. It is best enjoyed at the kitchen/living-room table. <img src='https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1444#comment-569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And by &quot;weight&quot; you mean &quot;DLC potential&quot;. Memoir 44 would have been perfect but they went the pay per play route with it, which was very disappointing. I&#039;d happily have paid £7-8 for a standalone version.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by &#8220;weight&#8221; you mean &#8220;DLC potential&#8221;. Memoir 44 would have been perfect but they went the pay per play route with it, which was very disappointing. I&#8217;d happily have paid £7-8 for a standalone version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interrobang‽</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-ticket-to-ride/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interrobang‽]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1444#comment-568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’m a little puzzled as to why it’s the palate cleanser they adapted and not those more demanding games&quot;

Because it&#039;s Days of Wonder doing their usual job of doing digital version of all their big sellers. Memoir 44 and Small World also have digital counterparts, and both would probably stand up better than Ticket to Ride to repeat playings. Nothing else in their catalogue has nearly as much weight behind it (all those 3 have obscene numbers of expansions).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m a little puzzled as to why it’s the palate cleanser they adapted and not those more demanding games&#8221;</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s Days of Wonder doing their usual job of doing digital version of all their big sellers. Memoir 44 and Small World also have digital counterparts, and both would probably stand up better than Ticket to Ride to repeat playings. Nothing else in their catalogue has nearly as much weight behind it (all those 3 have obscene numbers of expansions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
