<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: The Banner Saga 2</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts: The Banner Saga 3 &#124; The Scientific Gamer</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/#comment-48140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thoughts: The Banner Saga 3 &#124; The Scientific Gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4923#comment-48140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] aware that after 2016’s excellent Banner Saga 2 my expectations for Banner Saga 3 were somewhat high. I’m aware that it would have had a tricky [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] aware that after 2016’s excellent Banner Saga 2 my expectations for Banner Saga 3 were somewhat high. I’m aware that it would have had a tricky [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloody Battle Brain</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/#comment-29410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bloody Battle Brain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4923#comment-29410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Hentzau, I&#039;ve been following your blog for a while and your opinions almost always coincide precisely with mine. To that end, I&#039;d be very interested in hearing (reading) your views on Ashes of the Singularity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Hentzau, I&#8217;ve been following your blog for a while and your opinions almost always coincide precisely with mine. To that end, I&#8217;d be very interested in hearing (reading) your views on Ashes of the Singularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smurf</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/#comment-29368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smurf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4923#comment-29368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just about to ask the same question.  I followed the first one all the way through it&#039;s development and was so disappointed reading the reviews that I ended up not bothering with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just about to ask the same question.  I followed the first one all the way through it&#8217;s development and was so disappointed reading the reviews that I ended up not bothering with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/#comment-29367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4923#comment-29367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story does follow directly on from the first unfortunately, and while I was able to pick things back up pretty quickly after having my memory jogged several dozen times it&#039;d probably be a bit confusing to go in blind.

Still, the first Banner Saga wasn&#039;t a bad game, just a deeply flawed one. The combat gets a little painful but it&#039;s a worthwhile experience regardless, especially now that it has the payoff of game 2. In that context I&#039;d recommend it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story does follow directly on from the first unfortunately, and while I was able to pick things back up pretty quickly after having my memory jogged several dozen times it&#8217;d probably be a bit confusing to go in blind.</p>
<p>Still, the first Banner Saga wasn&#8217;t a bad game, just a deeply flawed one. The combat gets a little painful but it&#8217;s a worthwhile experience regardless, especially now that it has the payoff of game 2. In that context I&#8217;d recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninja Foodstuff</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-the-banner-saga-2/#comment-29364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja Foodstuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4923#comment-29364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth playing the first one before experiencing this one? I was completely put off by the sound of the samey combat originally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth playing the first one before experiencing this one? I was completely put off by the sound of the samey combat originally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
