<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Spelunky 2</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-61355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-61355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This. Man can&#039;t even beat the first game and is crying about how hard the second one is]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This. Man can&#8217;t even beat the first game and is crying about how hard the second one is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-61352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 02:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-61352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hint: I didn’t get here by googling “spelunky 2 is a good fun game I’m enjoying.” Everything you said is spot on]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hint: I didn’t get here by googling “spelunky 2 is a good fun game I’m enjoying.” Everything you said is spot on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obo</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-61351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 02:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-61351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just got this game. 6 hours in. I’m here. What does that tell you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got this game. 6 hours in. I’m here. What does that tell you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alende</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-60846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alende]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-60846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect analysis. Thanks. I&#039;m a little late to Spelunky 2 party, but when I finally got the game and found out how hard it was, it was such a turn off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect analysis. Thanks. I&#8217;m a little late to Spelunky 2 party, but when I finally got the game and found out how hard it was, it was such a turn off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-60597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[v]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 02:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-60597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you have made a couple good points but i dunno if its fair to consider yourself the target audience if after 60 hours you werent able to beat yama]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have made a couple good points but i dunno if its fair to consider yourself the target audience if after 60 hours you werent able to beat yama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilitarist</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-60551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ilitarist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-60551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the kind of thoughtful review analisys I come here for. Oh yes.

I didn&#039;t play Spelunky 1 for long. Guess never was in the mood for it. The only action roguelite that had really spoke to me was Hades (and arguably FTL if you consider it &quot;action&quot;) and it&#039;s enlightening to see those games reviewed back to back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the kind of thoughtful review analisys I come here for. Oh yes.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t play Spelunky 1 for long. Guess never was in the mood for it. The only action roguelite that had really spoke to me was Hades (and arguably FTL if you consider it &#8220;action&#8221;) and it&#8217;s enlightening to see those games reviewed back to back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-spelunky-2/#comment-60550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6254#comment-60550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Played an awful lot of Spelunky Classic but 10 hours in Spelunky 2 was more than enough to understand I have no interest in this extreme remix.
You are right though, watching streamers poke about in it is interesting enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Played an awful lot of Spelunky Classic but 10 hours in Spelunky 2 was more than enough to understand I have no interest in this extreme remix.<br />
You are right though, watching streamers poke about in it is interesting enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
