<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Bulletstorm.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/#comment-17141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1073#comment-17141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got round to actually playing through it (and who knows, this may have been the last opportunity to do so with GFWL getting knocked on the noggin) and thoroughly enjoyed myself.

Yes, the flaws you described are mostly there, but there was rarely a dull moment and the game encouraged you to have creative fun.

I didn&#039;t have a problem accruing points to play freely with all the weapons in the game. I build up a fair amount early on, and just spent excess on upgrades and ammo. And when the game gives you points for staring at stuff and various miscellaneous actions... it&#039;s definitely not too restricting.

What I did actually enjoy were the boss fights, whether on or off the rail. It rarely went anywhere frustrating. So extra points there.

If people come across it and haven&#039;t played it... well, I guess it might not be an awful idea to if you fancy a random, fun fps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got round to actually playing through it (and who knows, this may have been the last opportunity to do so with GFWL getting knocked on the noggin) and thoroughly enjoyed myself.</p>
<p>Yes, the flaws you described are mostly there, but there was rarely a dull moment and the game encouraged you to have creative fun.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have a problem accruing points to play freely with all the weapons in the game. I build up a fair amount early on, and just spent excess on upgrades and ammo. And when the game gives you points for staring at stuff and various miscellaneous actions&#8230; it&#8217;s definitely not too restricting.</p>
<p>What I did actually enjoy were the boss fights, whether on or off the rail. It rarely went anywhere frustrating. So extra points there.</p>
<p>If people come across it and haven&#8217;t played it&#8230; well, I guess it might not be an awful idea to if you fancy a random, fun fps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Benton</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1073#comment-338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gutted, too many games these days miss the trick of good ol&#039; proper co-op fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gutted, too many games these days miss the trick of good ol&#8217; proper co-op fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1073#comment-337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t tried it, but I believe the multiplayer is a co-op only swarm type of affair, yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tried it, but I believe the multiplayer is a co-op only swarm type of affair, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janek</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1073#comment-336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe there is some kind of ever-escalating arena mode point attack thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there is some kind of ever-escalating arena mode point attack thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Benton</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-bulletstorm/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1073#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a co-op on it? I imagine point scoring would be more fun competing with a friend, although I do have a sneaking suspiscion it would just wind up trying to stop the other person getting points and nobody really winning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a co-op on it? I imagine point scoring would be more fun competing with a friend, although I do have a sneaking suspiscion it would just wind up trying to stop the other person getting points and nobody really winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
