Comments on: Thoughts: Book Of Demons https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-book-of-demons/ Science, gaming, and all things in between. Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36 By: Hentzau https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-book-of-demons/#comment-54853 Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:28:52 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5694#comment-54853 It definitely feels like there’s a lot going on at times, it’s just that none of it is very interesting, so while I feel that “shallow” is a little harsh on Book Of Demons’ dungeon gameplay it’s probably close enough.

]]> By: Hentzau https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-book-of-demons/#comment-54852 Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:20:50 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5694#comment-54852 Yes! That was so weird, and actually put me off the game a little bit, because it feels a little ambitious/hubristic to say “we’re going to make six other games like this” when you’ve only just finished the first one. Maybe add the launcher after you have something else to put in it, eh?

]]> By: ilitarist https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-book-of-demons/#comment-54790 Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:34:20 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5694#comment-54790 I’ve played half of the game, liked it, never want to go back.

All this mouse moving feels original to me. It’s deliberately made into a game of clicking everything. But it felt very shallow beyond that.

]]> By: drinkwithskeletons https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-book-of-demons/#comment-54746 Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:08:39 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5694#comment-54746 I think one of the stranger things about this game is that it appears to just be the first in a planned series of papercraft-inspired games that, presumably, will each pay homage to/ripoff a different game/genre. I was pretty surprised when starting the game brought me to some kind of elaborate launcher rather than directly going to Book of Demons.

]]>