Comments on: Thoughts: Big Pharma https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-big-pharma/ Science, gaming, and all things in between. Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36 By: altandmain https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-big-pharma/#comment-26710 Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:15:34 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4682#comment-26710 Just a head’s up, but the developer abandoned his previous game, Gratuitous Space Battles 2 after it failed to meet up to sales expectations. I’m worried that the developer will do the same for this game.

I think that it is one of those games that needs a lot of balancing issues.

]]> By: Hentzau https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-big-pharma/#comment-25925 Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:19:50 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4682#comment-25925 It is, for about twelve hours. I really enjoyed the way it played around with effects and concentrations – or rather, that it made *me* play around with effects and concentrations. That’s partly why I’m so disappointed, though, since those drug-construction mechanics are so good that Big Pharma had a lot of potential that I felt was squandered in the metagame.

]]> By: Adam https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-big-pharma/#comment-25880 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:19:11 +0000 http://scientificgamer.com/?p=4682#comment-25880 This actually sounds like a great game.

]]>