<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Battlefleet Gothic Armada 2</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-battlefleet-gothic-armada-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-battlefleet-gothic-armada-2/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smaug</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-battlefleet-gothic-armada-2/#comment-55523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smaug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5774#comment-55523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can swear in one LP I saw there was also a Tau faction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can swear in one LP I saw there was also a Tau faction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ahn</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-battlefleet-gothic-armada-2/#comment-55200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Ahn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5774#comment-55200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds better and more polished than the first game, which means I shall probably pick it up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds better and more polished than the first game, which means I shall probably pick it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drinkwithskeletons</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-battlefleet-gothic-armada-2/#comment-55195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drinkwithskeletons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5774#comment-55195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh, that campaign length! The detail missing from all the reviews of this game that I wanted was whether the campaign had been dialed back a little, and it sounds like they doubled down on the slog. Still sounds like a worthy game to dabble in; I&#039;ll probably wait for a sale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, that campaign length! The detail missing from all the reviews of this game that I wanted was whether the campaign had been dialed back a little, and it sounds like they doubled down on the slog. Still sounds like a worthy game to dabble in; I&#8217;ll probably wait for a sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilitarist</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-battlefleet-gothic-armada-2/#comment-55194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ilitarist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5774#comment-55194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This meta-campaign layer sounds great. I haven&#039;t played Company of Heroes Ardenne&#039;s Assault but it sounds very similar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This meta-campaign layer sounds great. I haven&#8217;t played Company of Heroes Ardenne&#8217;s Assault but it sounds very similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
