<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts: Assassin&#8217;s Creed 3.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts: Assassin&#039;s Creed 4 - Black Flag. &#187; The Scientific Gamer The Scientific Gamer</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-16569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thoughts: Assassin&#039;s Creed 4 - Black Flag. &#187; The Scientific Gamer The Scientific Gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-16569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at the end of last year’s  Assassin’s Creed 3 review  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the end of last year’s  Assassin’s Creed 3 review  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Benton</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-15360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-15360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like I&#039;ll have to wait until its very discounted. Bet I can get Revelations cheap though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like I&#8217;ll have to wait until its very discounted. Bet I can get Revelations cheap though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-15358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-15358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saying it&#039;s about the same as AC2 seems like a massive slur on AC2, but I feel that&#039;s about where it is. I really liked AC2&#039;s setting and character, and I didn&#039;t like AC3&#039;s setting so much and I hated its main character, but as far as I can recall they&#039;re about on par in terms of what they&#039;re like as actual games. AC3 is probably a tad worse thanks to just how unfocused it is, and there isn&#039;t much it actually does better than 2, and when you look at it in the context of the previous two games and AC2 being released in 2009 you realise it&#039;s actually a massive regression for the series, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;d call AC3 bad as such. Just really incoherent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying it&#8217;s about the same as AC2 seems like a massive slur on AC2, but I feel that&#8217;s about where it is. I really liked AC2&#8242;s setting and character, and I didn&#8217;t like AC3&#8242;s setting so much and I hated its main character, but as far as I can recall they&#8217;re about on par in terms of what they&#8217;re like as actual games. AC3 is probably a tad worse thanks to just how unfocused it is, and there isn&#8217;t much it actually does better than 2, and when you look at it in the context of the previous two games and AC2 being released in 2009 you realise it&#8217;s actually a massive regression for the series, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d call AC3 bad as such. Just really incoherent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-15357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-15357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s nowhere near as tight as AC2 and doesn&#039;t have the redeeming feature of a main character who is quite compelling.

Bits of it are very good, but the whole experience is too fuzzy to say it&#039;s as good as AC2.

That said, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll fail to enjoy it... just... it&#039;s obviously nowhere near as good an AC game as it should be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nowhere near as tight as AC2 and doesn&#8217;t have the redeeming feature of a main character who is quite compelling.</p>
<p>Bits of it are very good, but the whole experience is too fuzzy to say it&#8217;s as good as AC2.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll fail to enjoy it&#8230; just&#8230; it&#8217;s obviously nowhere near as good an AC game as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Benton</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-15355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been re-playing brotherhood and AC2 and, whilst ACB is better, I still found AC2 enjoyable. As such I&#039;m not that fussed over whether AC3 matches up to the later sequels (since I plan on buying it later, at a discount) but whether it is at least as decent as AC2. So is it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been re-playing brotherhood and AC2 and, whilst ACB is better, I still found AC2 enjoyable. As such I&#8217;m not that fussed over whether AC3 matches up to the later sequels (since I plan on buying it later, at a discount) but whether it is at least as decent as AC2. So is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-14304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-14304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God I hated those. Connor was just the most awful character, actively frustrating to watch let alone play as.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God I hated those. Connor was just the most awful character, actively frustrating to watch let alone play as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-14303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-14303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve gone weirdly cold on Planetside, like I do with a lot of F2P games. But Assassin&#039;s Creed 3 is still worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gone weirdly cold on Planetside, like I do with a lot of F2P games. But Assassin&#8217;s Creed 3 is still worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everblue</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-14083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everblue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-14083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you preferred it to Planetside 2 then?

(Kidding - great review, thank you)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you preferred it to Planetside 2 then?</p>
<p>(Kidding &#8211; great review, thank you)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janek</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-14058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-14058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad I wasn&#039;t the only one who found The Baddy&#039;s flip from bumbling sidekick to MURDERDEATHBASTARD jarring.

I also basically found myself routing for the Templars for the entire game. Especially when they were making entirely reasonable arguments after Connor mortally wounded them and he&#039;s all like &quot;No you must all die, because FREEDOM&quot;

Ugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I wasn&#8217;t the only one who found The Baddy&#8217;s flip from bumbling sidekick to MURDERDEATHBASTARD jarring.</p>
<p>I also basically found myself routing for the Templars for the entire game. Especially when they were making entirely reasonable arguments after Connor mortally wounded them and he&#8217;s all like &#8220;No you must all die, because FREEDOM&#8221;</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-assassins-creed-3/#comment-14031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=2789#comment-14031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More realistically there are a few ways they can go with AssCreed 4 (ignoring the releases they&#039;ll do to over-clutter 3&#039;s gameplay even more... unless they do a Haytham Kenway standalone - I&#039;d play the shit out of that):

1) Prequels to the Desmond time-line and wherever else you want for the meat of the game. Okay probably, and at least has the chance to reduce the sci-fi wrapper to a minimum.

2) Post-Desmond sequel. Which would probably necessitate focusing a lot more on the sci-fi stuff in the &#039;present&#039;. Eugh.

3) Just cram everything into the last few moments of 3 and have it timelessly explain all the other ancestor stuff. A bit rubbish as the wrapper would not move on, but if we concentrate on the past stuff, maybe it would work.

4) Something I haven&#039;t thought of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More realistically there are a few ways they can go with AssCreed 4 (ignoring the releases they&#8217;ll do to over-clutter 3&#8242;s gameplay even more&#8230; unless they do a Haytham Kenway standalone &#8211; I&#8217;d play the shit out of that):</p>
<p>1) Prequels to the Desmond time-line and wherever else you want for the meat of the game. Okay probably, and at least has the chance to reduce the sci-fi wrapper to a minimum.</p>
<p>2) Post-Desmond sequel. Which would probably necessitate focusing a lot more on the sci-fi stuff in the &#8216;present&#8217;. Eugh.</p>
<p>3) Just cram everything into the last few moments of 3 and have it timelessly explain all the other ancestor stuff. A bit rubbish as the wrapper would not move on, but if we concentrate on the past stuff, maybe it would work.</p>
<p>4) Something I haven&#8217;t thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
