<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scientific Gamer &#187; planetary physics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/tag/planetary-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ask Hentzau: Scrat Continental Crack Up.</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/ask-hentzau-scrat-continental-crack-up/</link>
		<comments>https://scientificgamer.com/ask-hentzau-scrat-continental-crack-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ask hentzau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smurf I know it was you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tectonic plates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Yes, I have a name asks How scientifically accurate is this? [link to the above video] Well, Yes, I have now subjected the video to my merciless Science Sight several times, and I think it’s best to break it down stage-by-stage. Scrat is attempting to plant his nut in an icy landscape of some [&#8230;]</p><p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/ask-hentzau-scrat-continental-crack-up/">Ask Hentzau: Scrat Continental Crack Up.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='360' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/zocutif0cQY?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Yes, I have a name </strong>asks</p>
<blockquote><p>How scientifically accurate is this? [link to the above video]</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-786"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Well, Yes, I have now subjected the video to my merciless Science Sight several times, and I think it’s best to break it down stage-by-stage.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Scrat is attempting to plant his nut in an icy landscape of some kind. He very, very gingerly places it down…</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/mountainsplit.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-793" title="mountainsplit" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/mountainsplit.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="316" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">…and the entire mountain splits open beneath him in two neat halves. This might be possible if the mountain had no faults in its structure whatsoever aside from a really big one down the middle, but I don’t know why it suddenly stops mid-split the way it does. Perhaps it is on hinges?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The more pressing concern is how Scrat managed to do this by tapping it with a nut. Clearly the nut must be made of something incredibly dense to transfer that amount of kinetic energy to the mountain, and so <strong>Scrat must be commensurately strong</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/breakfall.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-787" title="breakfall" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/breakfall.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="285" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Scrat begins falling towards the centre of the Earth. He attempts to break his fall by bracing his hands against the sides of the tunnel he’s falling down, but his hands quickly start to glow red hot and he is forced to snatch them away before they catch on fire. From this we can conclude that <strong>Scrat has a skin that is both very, very tough</strong> – it has to be for his little arms not to be worn down to nubs way before they get to the red hot point – and which has a <strong>very high specific heat capacity</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/reentry.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-795" title="reentry" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/reentry.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="293" /></a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Scrat then turns into a whooshing fireball similar to a spacecraft making a re-entry maneuver. If you’re a skydiver, this doesn’t happen to you because the atmosphere through which you are falling is thick enough that it creates a significant amount of drag. Eventually the drag force upwards will equal the force of gravity pulling you downwards, and you reach a steady terminal velocity.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now, if you’re a spacecraft you’re messing around in parts of the atmosphere which are very thin. This permits much higher velocities to be obtained (indeed, they are required for spacecraft to stay in orbit) on the order of several kilometres per second, but since the spacecraft is moving so fast it’s still striking a lot of atmospheric gas molecules very, very quickly. This heats it up, creating the characteristic re-entry fireball. It’s why all spacecraft have at least one side which is covered with a heat-resistant shield: to prevent the spacecraft from burning up on re-entry.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Scrat doesn’t have a heat shield, but that’s okay because we’ve already established that he has a tough, heat-resistant skin that amounts to much the same thing. More interesting is the fact that while he must be falling through some sort of gas in order to create the fireball, the concentration of that gas must be very, very low to allow him to reach fireball velocity. Therefore <strong>Scrat does not need to breathe.</strong> If he did, he’d be dead.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/schematic.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-796" title="schematic" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/schematic.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="285" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The action switches to an internal schematic of the Earth showing Scrat’s descent through the various layers – crust, mantle and core. This is actually mostly genuinely accurate, although I really don’t know what the animators were smoking when they say the inner core is often drawn in textbooks to resemble <a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fig.jpg">a giant floating pinball</a>. I’ve certainly never seen one that drew it like that.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/landing.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-792" title="landing" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/landing.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="297" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Scrat then lands on the inner core of the Earth, which is… uh, floating in space like a giant pinball. I don’t really have a problem with the floating because if it’s dead centre it’s going to be evenly surrounded by the rest of the Earth’s mass pulling in all directions, which could conceivably cause it to float. The problem here is that the inner core is a) not hot, b) not rotating and c) very small, only being a few dozen times the size of Scrat. The camera zooms out into space, showing the Earth as it was <a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/pangaea.jpg">“a really, really long time ago</a>” with the land mass all clustered together into one supercontinent, Pangaea. Awesomely it really does resemble our closest estimate of what Pangaea looked like, so a point to the film makers there.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/chase.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-788" title="chase" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/chase.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Scrat picks himself up and returns to his immediate objective of retrieving his acorn. But, disaster! As he moves towards it, the Earth’s core begins to rotate underneath him! Scrat must be very strong in order to pick up and carry his super-heavy acorn, but this is the first indication we’ve been given that <strong>Scrat himself is dense/heavy enough to be able to physically move the core of the Earth.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/split.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-798" title="split" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/split.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="295" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As Scrat runs on the core, bad things start happening up above. The Pangaean continent begins to split and separate, with his increasingly desperate efforts creating the present-day continents one after another. This, sadly, is the most scientifically implausible part of the whole film, since I really don’t see any way running on the core could even begin to affect the land masses floating around on the mantle like this. <a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/giraffe.jpg">Giraffes are created</a> when the land they’re grazing on splits and separates underneath them forcing their necks to stretch to compensate, which is actually a fairly neat shorthand for what actually happened.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/stretch.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-799" title="stretch" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/stretch.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="290" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There’s some hijinks with Scrat creating various landmarks and monuments in his image that I’m not going to go into because I’m not an architect, but finally Scrat loses his footing and gets bounced around the core before ending up wrapped around it like spaghetti. This is important, because we now know that <strong>Scrat</strong> <strong>is made of something that is incredibly ductile and elastic which suffers almost no plastic deformation.</strong> He then unwinds from the core and is flung back up through the hole he fell through all the way out into space – but since Scrat has a very tough skin and does not need to breathe, vacuum is no problem for him.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ice.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-791" title="ice" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ice.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="293" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The film ends with Scrat landing on top of a piece of ice floating on the ocean which – incredibly – is not pulverised instantly beneath his vast weight, but instead merely fractures in two, separating Scrat from his beloved acorn. We’ve learned many, many important things about Scrat from our three minutes in his company, and I’ll sum them up here.</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Scrat is inhumanly strong.</li>
<li>Scrat is made of something very tough.</li>
<li>Scrat is made of something that resists heat very well.</li>
<li>Scrat is made of something incredibly dense.</li>
<li>Scrat does not need to breathe.</li>
<li>Scrat can stretch and deform at will and still resume his original shape.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Normally I’d say that there’s no one material that can fulfil all of these criteria and dismiss the whole thing as scientifically inaccurate, but if you think hard enough it turns out there is something that can do the job. If Scrat is composed of mimetic polyalloy he could alter his internal composition at will so that he possessed all of these qualities. What I am saying here is that, yes, Scrat is the T-1000.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/terminator.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-800" title="terminator" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/terminator.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Don’t fuck with him.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">PS &#8212; This was fun, but don&#8217;t expect me to deconstruct a cartoon every week.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/ask-hentzau-scrat-continental-crack-up/">Ask Hentzau: Scrat Continental Crack Up.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://scientificgamer.com/ask-hentzau-scrat-continental-crack-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Another Bug Hunt.</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/just-another-bug-hunt/</link>
		<comments>https://scientificgamer.com/just-another-bug-hunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian EXPLETIVE DELETED Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extremophiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Topical science time! This recent news article caught my eye the other day. Russian scientists have succeeded in drilling through the 3.7 km thick layer of ice covering Lake Vostok in Antartica and hope to be able to extract samples from the lake later this year. Lake Vostok has been completely sealed off from the [&#8230;]</p><p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/just-another-bug-hunt/">Just Another Bug Hunt.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/boctock.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-479" title="Boctok? BOCTOK? Oh, those crazy Russians." src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/boctock.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Topical science time! This <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/06/russian-scientists-drill-antarctic-lake">recent news article</a> caught my eye the other day. Russian scientists have succeeded in drilling through the 3.7 km thick layer of ice covering Lake Vostok in Antartica and hope to be able to extract samples from the lake later this year. Lake Vostok has been completely sealed off from the surface for about twenty million years. This makes it a very interesting place to look for life forms, and what they’re doing in Lake Vostok right now is not a million miles away from the way we’ll likely find the first alien life forms.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span id="more-477"></span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">The environment inside Lake Vostok is, to put it mildly, just a little bit exotic, and not the first place you’d expect to find bacteria. The ice sheet covering it is so thick that we didn’t even know for sure that there was water down there until aircraft- and space-based radar picked it up in the early 90s. Because it’s got a 3.7 km thick ice layer sitting on top of it, that water is under a tremendous amount of pressure – enough so that it remains liquid<sup>1</sup> despite having an average temperature of -3<sup>o</sup>C. This high pressure also results in that water being supersaturated with high concentrations of oxygen and nitrogen than you’d find in an equivalent surface lake, much of which has been forced into “cages” of water molecules called clathrates. There is no light at the bottom of Lake Vostok, but that’s okay because there’s no light at the bottom of the ocean either and we find plenty of stuff living – in fact, thriving – down there, most of which tends to cluster around geothermal vents on the ocean floor – and we suspect the same might be true of Lake Vostok.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Not that you particularly need a geothermal vent to support life these days. Hopefully you’ll have heard of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/06/russian-scientists-drill-antarctic-lake">these guys</a> – the extremophiles. Over the last few decades we’ve kept finding them in locations which were thought to be completely inhospitable to life – too hot, too cold, too acid, too alkali, too saline, even too radioactive. In all of these places extremophiles thrive, and some of them even <em>need</em> those harsh conditions in order to survive; for example the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halophile">halophile</a> loves salt and can’t grow without at least a reasonably high concentration of it present in its surrounding environment.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/waterbear.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-482" title="What that's not a bear. Bears are cuddly. This thing looks like it wants to rip my face off." src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/waterbear.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="425" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">This has completely revolutionised our view of the conditions required for life to exist, and it’s entirely possible that at the bottom of Lake Vostok there will be a colony of extremophiles that has been evolving entirely on its own for the last 15-20 million years, and which has adapted to exist in the freezing, oxygen-rich environment down there. If they do exist, then those extremophiles will be completely unlike anything we’ve so far observed; bear in mind that twenty million years ago the ancestors of the human race <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proconsul_%28primate%29">looked something like this</a> and then consider what those twenty million years of divergent evolution might do to bacteria. If they’re down there, and the Russians do find them, then it’ll be as close as we can get to finding alien life without actually going to another planet to do it.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">What does this mean for the chances of alien life existing? Well, it improves them considerably, at least in terms of micro-organisms &#8212; you might not be able to have a conversation with one but you can at least be comforted that somewhere out there in the Milky Way is the alien equivalent of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade">tardigrade</a>. However, it also improves the odds of us, personally (or at least a probe controlled by us) going out into space and actually digging some of these things up. You see, Lake Vostok isn’t the only place in the Solar System where there’s a large quantity of water trapped under several kilometres of ice. Several of the moons of the gas giants also qualify; notably Europa, Ganymede<sup>2</sup> and Callisto.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/europaint.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-481" title="I cut out the portion of this image that had the alternative model of the warm convecting ice layer. Wouldn't do to have people think scientists have literally no idea what the hell is going on down there." src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/europaint.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="387" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Europa is the really interesting one. The surface of Europa is entirely composed of ice, making it by far the smoothest body in the Solar System, but we think that ice surface is only 10-30 km thick. Beneath that is a layer of conducting fluid – overwhelmingly likely to be saltwater – that was detected by the Galileo probe via its magnetic moment. This water is kept relatively warm by tidal heating<sup>3</sup> provided by Jupiter, and it’s <em>possible</em>, although nobody knows exactly <em>how</em> possible, that there might be microbial life down there living in environments similar to the ones we find extremophiles inhabiting on Earth – in cold, dark environments like the bottom of Lake Vostok, or next to deep sea thermal vents that spit out heat from the moon’s interior (it does have radioactive decay heating, although this is deemed insufficient to create the subsurface oceans). Missions to visit Europa to try and find some of this life have been mooted for years, although I don’t believe any of the proposals have satisfactorily tackled the question of how exactly you drill through ten kilometres of ice on another planet with a robot probe when it’s taken the team at Lake Vostok decades to bore through four kilometres with the benefit of having humans on hand to operate the equipment. Regardless, it’s likely that it’ll be tried sooner or later depending on what future technology does or does not render possible, and so if you’re unlucky enough to be alive seventy or eight years from now you might end up having the news of the first discovery of alien life piped into your brain through your neuro-cortical machine interface.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">The other possibilities are somewhat less interesting. Ganymede has an ice-silicate lithosphere over 200 km thick covering its ocean, so it’s doubtful we’ll ever be able to tunnel down <em>there</em>. Callisto too has a surface layer up to 150 km thick. Enceladus on the other hand is kind of promising; if you’ve watched that EXPLETIVE DELETED Brian Cox on his EXPLETIVE DELETED EXPLETIVE DELETED series Wonders of the Solar System, you’ll be aware that Enceladus has a surface which, like Europa, is composed entirely of ice, but that Enceladus is unique in that the Cassini probe observed water vapour outgassing from the surface in 2008. This points to the presence of liquid water in some form or other, the most likely source of which is yet another subsurface ocean – and since it’s outgassing directly from the surface, it points to this ocean being somewhat more accessible than that of Europa (after all, it needs some way to get there from the interior). At the very least it should be possible to collect material that has come directly from the ocean and determine its composition, and thus its likelihood of being able to support life. While Enceladus isn’t necessarily a better bet for <em>finding</em> life than Europa, it’s potentially far more useful for telling us what the odds of that bet actually are.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/thingfull.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-484" title="&quot;I was having a lovely sleep until you jerks bored down here with your giant drill. Now I shall devour your entire pitiful race!&quot;" src="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/thingthumb.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="381" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">The first step, though, is to look at these subsurface water environments on Earth. The Lake Vostok team has been painstakingly drilling through the ice for years while constantly at the mercy of the Antarctic elements (Lake Vostok is the coldest place on Earth). They used a thermal sensor to detect when they were approaching a source of free water and stopped the drill, the general idea being that the decrease in pressure would allow the ice separating the borehole and the lake to melt and then refreeze; they can then retrieve this portion of ice to examine water that has come directly from the lake. Meanwhile they’ve examined the last piece of ice extracted from the borehole – which contains ice thought to have frozen onto the bottom of the ice sheet hundreds of thousands of years ago – and they’ve managed to turn up evidence of extremophile microbes, so the odds are good that there’s a colony of <em>something </em>down there. The team has plans to go even further by sending a robot down in late 2013 to retrieve samples from the sediment making up the lake bed. I suggest you pay attention to the results, if only to make sure that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7AH4JyuNs">this</a> hasn’t happened.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">
<p style="text-align:justify;">1. If you think back to the <a href="http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/this-is-why-galactus-likes-eating-planets/">geophysics post</a> you’ll recall that the normal rules of physics don’t really apply when you crush something underneath hundreds of millions of tons of pressure. Rock cannot melt despite being at a high temperature because melting would require it to have some room into which it can expand – and because it’s compressed so much by the high pressure, this is the one thing it doesn’t have. Because water is unusual in that it actually expands in volume upon freezing into ice, the same rule applies to Lake Vostok.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">2. CORRECTION: I stated in the geophysics post that Earth is the only body in the Solar System known to have a liquid iron core. While this is broadly correct, it is also suspected that Ganymede, Venus and Mercury <em>might</em> have them as well; Ganymede is very uncertain, Venus is likely based on its similar size to Earth (with the absence of plate tectonics being explained by there being no water on the surface of Venus to soften up the crust enough to allow plate formation/subduction) and Mercury has a strong magnetic field <em>relative to its size</em> which also points to the existence of a partially liquid core. Tectonic behaviour is observed on many of the icy moons of the gas giants, but their tectonics all involve chunks of ice shifting around and not rock. Earth is still a unique case in terms of the strong magnetosphere and plate tectonics.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">3. Ever seen a <a href="http://www.scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/600px-io_highest_resolution_true_color.jpg">picture</a> of Io? I don’t particularly recommend it as a holiday destination because it’s absolutely <em>covered</em> in volcanoes. In terms of raw geological activity it puts the Earth in the shade, but unlike the Earth this is entirely down to outside forces: tidal heating caused by a constant tug of war on Io between Jupiter and the other Galilean moons which constantly squeezes and stresses it like… well, like somebody constantly squeezing and stressing a stress ball. Io has to relive this internal pressure somehow, and it does it by forming volcanoes which constantly spew out poisonous sulphur gas, which has stained the entire planetary surface a sickly yellow colour.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/just-another-bug-hunt/">Just Another Bug Hunt.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://scientificgamer.com/just-another-bug-hunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
