<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scientific Gamer &#187; escape from monkey island</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/tag/escape-from-monkey-island/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>LucasArts Time Machine: Escape From Monkey Island</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-escape-from-monkey-island/</link>
		<comments>https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-escape-from-monkey-island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escape from monkey island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Praise Of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lucasarts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lucasarts time machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkey island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=7003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Deep breaths. You can do this. You can do this. Good god, but it’s difficult. Escape From Monkey Island, while not exactly plumbing the same depths as the truly awful LucasArts adventures like Zak McKraken and Fate of Atlantis, still does not make itself a particularly easy game to like, or to play. I am [&#8230;]</p><p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-escape-from-monkey-island/">LucasArts Time Machine: Escape From Monkey Island</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_building.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7008" title="Here's the process for making a location in Escape: place a cube, put a roof and a door on it, and then a sign on top saying what it is. Congratulations, you can now slam that shit into the final game with no further modification." alt="escape_building" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_building-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Deep breaths. You can do this. <i>You can do this</i>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-7003"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Good god, but it’s difficult. <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i>, while not exactly plumbing the same depths as the truly awful LucasArts adventures like <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-zak-mckracken-and-the-alien-mindbenders/"><i>Zak McKraken</i></a> and<i> </i><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-indiana-jones-and-the-fate-of-atlantis/"><i>Fate of Atlantis</i></a>, still does not make itself a particularly easy game to like, or to <i>play</i>. I am not entirely sure what was going on with the personnel situation at LucasArts while it was being made, but the feeling I get when playing it is the same one I experienced when playing <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-mass-effect-andromeda-2/"><i>Mass Effect Andromeda</i></a>, or the single-player campaign of <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-halo-infinite/"><i>Halo Infinite</i></a>, where the teams responsible for the original classics had long since moved on and their replacements were trying to put together a sort of cargo-cult copy without understanding how or why anything in the originals worked.  <i>Escape</i> feels like the most expensive <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i> fan game ever made, and while I don’t have the phrase “fan game” down in my lexicon as a pure pejorative, when I apply it to a product made by the professionals at LucasArts, the supposed masters of the adventure game genre, I definitely mean it as one.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It’s not like I didn’t go into it with an open mind. I have played through <i>Escape</i> exactly once, when it first came out in 2000, and while I thought it was incredibly average in comparison to <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/"><i>Curse</i></a> and there were some bits that seemed spectacularly idiotic even to 16-year-old me (like Monkey Kombat), I didn’t <i>hate</i> it. Sure, the discourse turned against it during the subsequent decades and I had my opinion partially poisoned by groupthink that it was actually a disaster of a game, but set against that is… well, I have played some real fucking stinkers as part of this series, and also <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/thoughts-chinatown-detective-agency/"><i>Chinatown Detective Agency</i></a> earlier this year, so my scale for what constitutes a truly crap adventure game has been appropriately recalibrated. In spite of its reputation I wasn’t expecting <i>Escape</i> to be <i>that</i> bad, just incredibly underwhelming, and gave it the fairest go I possibly could.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Only to find that, no, it really <i>does</i> just suck.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_figurehead.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7007" title="Just in case you didn't get the joke, the figurehead later screams 'I'm king of the world!' at you." alt="escape_figurehead" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_figurehead-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Story-wise, <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> is a (sort of) direct sequel to <i>Curse</i>, in so much as that actually matters for a series of comedy pirate-themed adventure games. Having reversed the curse of the diamond ring and defeated the ghost pirate LeChuck for a third time, series protagonist Guybrush Threepwood marries Elaine and spends the next three months on a pirate honeymoon… only to return to Melee Island and discover that he and Elaine have been declared dead, Elaine is being challenged in the gubernatorial elections by a slimy politician called Charles L Charles (hmm, I wonder who this could be?), and that the Carribean generally is being taken over by an unscrupulous Australian business magnate called Ozzie Mandrill, who is driving out all of the pirates and replacing them with tacky pirate-themed tourist traps like Starbuccaneers and Planet Threepwood.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And straight away we have a problem. I like the <i>Monkey Island</i> series because, while it’s ostensibly very stupid and self-referential and not afraid to break the fourth wall at all, it’s usually quite clever about how it does it.  <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-the-secret-of-monkey-island/">The first game</a> was the best at leveraging this, being full of anachronistic jokes about the extremely theme park-y nature of its world (as well as adventure games in general), but they were always delivered with the narrative equivalent of a knowing wink because the writing assumed the player was smart enough to already be in on said jokes without over-explaining them. You have isolated absurdities like the grog machine and the piranha poodles and the guy in the troll costume who eats the red herring, and there are a <i>lot</i> of them, but they’re <i>isolated</i>; most of the time the game is paying just enough lip service to its pirate theming to maintain kayfabe, because these anachronisms are only funny if they’re actually anachronisms &#8212; i.e. genuinely out of place given the context of the surrounding world.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_starbucks.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7006" title="Not sure anything dates the game more than it thinking 'groggoccino' is a good joke. Hell, Fraiser had been running for five or six years at this point, Escape is in danger of missing the bus here." alt="escape_starbucks" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_starbucks-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But where <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i>’s story and humour was stupid in a clever way, <i>Escape From Monkey Island’</i>s story and humour is just stupid in a <i>stupid</i> way. This is not a pirate-themed adventure game with a lot of modern-day references, this is a modern-themed (or at least 2000s-era modern) adventure game that occasionally remembers that it was supposed to have pirates in it at one point. When nearly everything in the game is something ripped directly from the real world, the anachronisms cease to be remarkable &#8212; they’re just <i>normal</i>, at that point. Why is the idea of a Starbuccaneers funny if it’s on an entire island full of chain restaurants and microbreweries and real estate offices? If <i>everything</i> in your game is absurd and ridiculous, then <i>nothing</i> is; it’s just business as usual, which is kind of a problem when this is the only joke that <i>Escape</i> really knows how to do. And if you’re so insecure that you have to explain that joke up front, again and again, then you’re a <i>terrible</i> comedian. This is the exact same mistake the end of <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-monkey-island-2/"><i>Monkey Island 2</i></a> made, except applied to an entire game, and it is absolutely awful.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So <i>Escape</i>, by its very nature, is a game that’s laser-targeted to piss me off, with absolutely none of the exceptionally self-assured dry humour of the games it’s supposed to be following up, and which failed to make me laugh even once. This time around, though, there was something that felt awfully familiar about the way it was going about this. <i>Escape </i>features:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>An obsession with Americana and tourism.</li>
<li>Incredibly US-centric humour that has all of the subtlety and sophistication of a fart machine.</li>
<li>An Australian villain.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And yet I didn’t manage to connect the dots until a friend explicitly pointed this out: the lead designers on <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> are the same criminals responsible for <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-sam-max-hit-the-road/"><i>Sam &amp; Max</i></a>. Everything fell into place after that; <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> has far more in common with <i>Sam &amp; Max</i> &#8211; a game that I <i>intensely </i>disliked &#8212; than it does the <i>Monkey Island</i> series, to the point where it isn’t so much <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i><i> 4</i> as it is the <i>Sam &amp; Max</i> sequel that Sean Clark presumably hadn’t been allowed to make.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_mandrill.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7005" title="Ha ha, look at the Australian things! Kangaroos! Platypuses! He's called Mandrill! Aren't these words funny? Aren't we *clever*! (Although I thought the mandrill was an African thing.)" alt="escape_mandrill" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_mandrill-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This goes a long way towards explaining why <i>Escape</i> is the way it is. Perennial series villain LeChuck is stuck playing second fiddle to an incredibly boring pisstake of Rupert Murdoch because the <i>Sam &amp; Max </i>designers think Australia and Australians are inherently funny. Spoiler: they are not, and the uncharitable part of me strongly suspects that the designers and writers of <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> had never travelled outside of the continental United States, because that’s the only way you <i>could</i> find the mere concept of an Australian accent side-splittingly hilarious. This would also explain why <i>Escape</i> appears to be a game targeted solely at the US market; LucasArts games have always had this problem where a lot of the humour is dependent on having at least a surface-level understanding of US history and culture, but <i>Escape</i> takes it to another level entirely. Even now, twenty-two years later, there are lines in <i>Escape</i> that are clearly structured like jokes, and which are clearly meant to be funny, but which remain largely impenetrable to me because they’re only parsable by people who grew up in the US in the 80s and 90s. The Marco Polo “joke” is the best example of this &#8212; I <i>think</i> it’s a game (or hazing ritual) in American schools, but that’s only my best guess based on the context it’s presented to me in, and even with that knowledge I don’t understand why the joke is supposed to be funny.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(Of course I’m overlooking the most obvious explanation here: that the joke simply isn’t very good.)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The really weird thing about <i>Escape</i> being the most insular LucasArts adventure game of them all is that <i>Curse</i> undersold in the US &#8212; the entire <i>series</i> historically undersold in the US &#8212; and Wikipedia tells me that <i>Escape</i> would not have been made if not for strong sales of <i>Curse</i> in Germany. When the game performs so poorly in the US market, why are you cutting out everyone who lives outside of it &#8212; i.e. the people who bought your game in the past, and who you are hoping will show up to buy the sequel &#8212; from half of the jokes? And then the other half are just absolutely insipid, lowest common denominator stuff. We have some charming 2000-era joking around disabled people and the use of politically-correct language, Guybrush complains on multiple occasions because he’s been given a pink ship, and the portrayal of Guybrush and Elaine as a married couple is one step away from deploying words like “ball and chain”. This wouldn’t have raised too many eyebrows at the time but coming back to it in 2022 is pretty cringeworthy stuff; when the figurehead of Guybrush’s ship comes alive and starts talking to him it’s actually a relief that it’s only used to hit you around the head with a <i>Titanic</i> reference (that I already got thanks to the figurehead’s pose) instead of anything mildly sexist or ableist.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_marco.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7004" title="Marco is horrifying. Look at that waist. Look at those *teeth*." alt="escape_marco" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_marco-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I’d like to say that the <i>Sam &amp; Max</i> connection also explains why <i>Escape </i>is such a startlingly ugly game, but this is something that makes a little less sense than the rest of it. Both <i>Sam &amp; Max</i> and <i>Escape</i> are massively overfond of every single character in the game being a grotesque caricature that is thoroughly unsettling to look at and unpleasant to talk to. In <i>Escape</i>’s case this is at least partly because of the limitations of the 3D models; where <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-grim-fandango/"><i>Grim Fandango</i></a> wisely chose to populate its world with a cast of stylised skeletons that didn’t have a huge amount of model detail, <i>Escape</i> has to figure out how to render a convincing pirate using technology that honestly feels pretty primitive even for 2000. Guybrush is the only character drawn in a semi-straightforward style and he might be the worst of the lot; he has none of the expressiveness of his prior incarnations, and so you spend most of the game in the company of an empty-eyed mannequin wearing a constant idiotic smirk. Given how he turned out I can somewhat understand the more extreme cartoonish stylisation of the various NPCs he meets along the way, but the overall choices made are baffling: the game is full of too-long noses, too-wide smiles and proportions straight out of a <i>Hellraiser</i> movie that make me wonder if I’m going to be meeting any of these characters in my nightmares later.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And <i>Escape</i>’s handling of its pre-rendered 2D backdrops gives me a new appreciation for <i>Grim Fandango</i>’s. Sure, they haven’t aged well in places, but there was an artistic vision driving most of <i>Grim Fandango</i> (except for the brown bits) that occasionally transcended the limitations of late 90s CG artwork and which somewhat insulated the rest of it from the passage of time. By contrast <i>Escape</i>’s backdrops are best described as the CG equivalent of drawings in Microsoft Paint, because they have no <i>imagination</i>. Every building is a square box with a sign on it telling you what it is. Every interior is the same collection of brown walls and brown flooring and brown stairs and brown railings and brown furniture. In the rare event that the game chooses to insert some detail into an environment, it’ll self-sabotage by using Comic Sans (or an adjacent font) for its lettering. The only thing that really stands out is the signature <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i> cloud artwork, and even this just serves to highlight how crap the rest of it is by its sheer incongruousness. It’s only when you get to Monkey Island itself in the third act of the game that the game steps outside of the Brown paradigm; it’s here that the one mildly impressive environment is to be found, with the stained glass windows in the Church of LeChuck serving as the only real creative outlet for an art team that used to be regarded as the best in the industry. This is not a world that I <i>want</i> to spend any time in, and <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> as a whole is quite possibly the ugliest LucasArts adventure since <i>Zak McKraken</i>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_time.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7009" title="Behold, the one puzzle in Escape that I actually somewhat like, along with the one joke that's almost as clever as the game thinks it is." alt="escape_time" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_time-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So the writing sucks and it’s no fun to look at, but what about the puzzles? Well, the best thing I can say about <i>Escape</i>’s puzzles is that, having played through the entire LucasArts adventure game catalogue now, they’re not quite as bad as they could have been. There is a tenuous thread of logic that runs through most of them, and while that logic is often cartoon logic (these <i>are</i> the same people who made <i>Sam &amp; Max</i>, after all), it wasn’t that often that I was stymied by a complete non-sequitur of a solution. Guybrush still gives verbal hints as to what you’re supposed to do, and while these aren’t as helpful as the ones from <i>Curse</i> they’re usually enough to stop you straying too far in your thinking. There is one extremely notable exception to all this that I’ll get into in just a moment, and there are a few other blips that I could call out if I really wanted to (like the manhole cover and the parrots) but on the whole I think <i>Escape</i>’s puzzles are, while incredibly tedious, also reasonably inoffensive; the real problem with them is that they’re usually trying to be funny in some way, and <i>Escape</i>’s constant failure to actually <i>be</i> funny just ends up being sad, after a while. Because they’re not funny they just come across as the tedious make-work that adventure game puzzles ultimately are; since I didn’t care about the story and they weren’t making me laugh, and also because the GrimE engine has really cut down on the potential for custom animations or interface fuckery, solving them was a comparatively mundane process that carried zero weight or sense of accomplishment. It was just a series of boring, joyless tasks, and then once I’d finished them the game was over.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Anyone who has been unfortunate enough to play <i>Escape</i> themselves can probably guess what the exception is though; two words guaranteed to strike fear into the heart of any <i>Monkey Island</i> series veteran: Monkey Kombat. This is <i>Escape</i>’s take on Insult Swordfighting, a series “tradition” that has at this point been run so far into the ground it can probably start mining for rare earth minerals. Unlike most people I’ve hated Insult Swordfighting ever since it appeared in the first <i>Monkey Island</i>; it’s a puzzle that’s mostly reliant on trial and error as you gather the insults and their responses, but Monkey Kombat goes one step further and makes itself <i>entirely</i> reliant on trial and error. Because this is 2000, and because the writers of <i>Escape</i> are a collection of the least funny people on the face of planet Earth, Monkey Kombat is an entire game system predicated on the idea that the player will laugh and laugh and laugh when they see <i>Escape</i> has included a parody of <i>Mortal Kombat</i>. Guybrush fights a collection of monkeys by assuming one of five stances, and each stance can beat two of the four other stances. But he doesn’t know which stances beat which to start with, and he also doesn’t know which button combinations move from stance to stance, and he has to gather this by repeatedly losing to the monkeys while the player painstakingly generates a list of the 25 possible stance combinations and the button presses required to win each one.  There are no jokes in Monkey Kombat besides the name, as the button presses correspond to monkey noises (“Oop! Ack! Chee!”) instead of “witty” repartee, and so all it is is a pure time sink. <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> clocks in at a whopping six hours long, and a full half an hour of that was Monkey Kombat. It’s the single biggest factor in my rating of <i>Escape </i>dropping from “not as bad as <i>Zak McKraken</i>” to “<i>almost</i> as bad as <i>Zak McKraken</i>”.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(And just in case you’re thinking “Well, if making the list of stances is so boring, why not just look it up on the internet?” LucasArts are way ahead of you, since Monkey Kombat is one of several puzzles in <i>Escape</i> where the solution is randomised per playthrough to ensure that the player <i>has</i> to endure the sheer tedium of it.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_monkey.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7010" title="I had to make a spreadsheet to solve this." alt="escape_monkey" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_monkey-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As tedious as the puzzles are, though, they’d be even worse if not for the improvements made to the GrimE engine. If I had had to play <i>Escape</i> with <i>Grim Fandango</i> controls I would <i>not</i> have made it to the end; it’s the longest LucasArts adventure game of them all, and having to deal with that crap for six hours is completely out of the question, especially when I’m playing the original release and not a fancy remaster with point-and-click controls that could be optionally invoked to sand off some of the rough edges, as I was with <i>Grim Fandango</i>. Fortunately while LucasArts may have forgotten how to write or structure an adventure game, with <i>Escape</i> they <i>did</i> belatedly remember some of the quality-of-life lessons they’d learned after making 11 games in the SCUMM engine:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>The biggest one is listing all objects in proximity to Guybrush at the bottom of the screen and letting you page through them with Page Up/Down to select the one you want him to interact with, which probably shaved around an hour off the game’s running time because I wasn’t wasting any of it accidentally interacting with the wrong item as I did in <i>Grim Fandango</i>, repeatedly.</li>
<li>The inventory is still something that you scroll through one item at a time, but in <i>Escape</i> you can at least see the <i>entire</i> inventory while you’re scrolling and quickly get to the item you want.</li>
<li>There are once again dedicated keyboard buttons to Use and Pick Up objects instead of having to rely on the blunt instrument of Interact for the entire game, and &#8212; a godsend &#8212; an additional Outside command that immediately teleports you either outside the building you’re currently in, or out of the settlement to the world map</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These improvements are still nowhere near providing the precision and convenience of the final tranche of SCUMM games, but they are appreciated nevertheless, and if <i>Grim Fandango</i> had had these extra features I think I would have liked it a lot more.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Otherwise I think the only part of <i>Escape</i> that really pulls its weight is <a href="https://youtu.be/O7zd9oNxk6M">the music</a>. This is not outstanding by LucasArts standards &#8212; it’s severely handicapped by the best tracks having obnoxious background ambience baked into the sound files &#8212; but it sounds like <i>Monkey Island</i> and makes for a perfectly pleasant listen. I was even surprised to find that I <i>remembered</i> some of it, like the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7zd9oNxk6M&amp;t=1443s">Lucre island theme</a>; it had been buried in my brain for over two decades, but as soon as I heard the first few bars the rest of it came flooding back. There aren’t that many standout tracks, but what’s here is good nevertheless and I think I was just surprised to find something to <i>like</i> about <i>Escape</i> since the soundtrack is so much better than the game it’s unfortunately stuck in.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(Oh, and while we’re on the subject of sound stuff: Dominic Armato returns as Guybrush but there’s a weird desperation to his voice acting performance in this game, like he’s a struggling improv comedian who <i>really</i> wants people to laugh at his jokes. This is at least in keeping with the tone of the rest of the game, and I can’t exactly say I blame him since I don’t think there’s <i>anyone</i> out there that could make this material work.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_herman.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7011" title="Oh no, Herman! What have they *done* to you?" alt="escape_herman" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/escape_herman-580x435.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">About the best thing that I can say about <i>Escape From Monkey Island</i> is that it’s not <i>quite</i> the worst LucasArts adventure game ever made. As unfunny as it is, as ugly as it looks, and as boring as its puzzles might be, I think that if you gave me a choice between playing <i>Escape</i> or playing <i>Fate of Atlantis</i> or <i>Zak McKraken</i> again I would probably still pick <i>Escape</i>. It’s a very close-run thing, though, and a damning indictment of LucasArts that, with all of their experience and talent, the last adventure game they ever made was also one of their worst. <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/">My piece on <i>Curse</i></a> already covered the wider reasons why adventure games were becoming increasingly unprofitable to make in the late 90s, but I think <i>Escape</i> is sufficient evidence that even if this were not the case, LucasArts were still starting to lose their grip on the genre thanks to technological changes and employee churn. It’s probably for the best that <i>Escape</i> <i></i>was their final adventure game. As it is they get to be fondly remembered as the once-mighty titans of the adventure game genre, a studio known for top-notch production values and who were not content to rest on their laurels; one thing I’ve learned from this series is that LucasArts were always trying new things in an attempt to keep things fresh and maintain consumer interest, and while this produced games of wildly varying quality I could almost always find something to like about them. A few more games like <i>Escape</i>, though, and I think their reputation would have gone straight into the toilet the way Bioware’s has today.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Two years and thirteen games later and I’m finally done with this series. If nothing else it’s been very educational and has filled in some long-standing gaps in my gaming knowledge. I’ve been doing this blog for ten years now and I think this is the first one of these dedicated series I’ve actually managed to finish, and I’m happy to be able to finally draw a line under the LucasArts adventure games &#8212; after all, they’ve been dead for nearly as long as this blog has been alive, and surely nobody in their right mind would release a brand new adventure game using LucasArts IP in 2022?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/2060130/Return_to_Monkey_Island/">Ah, <i>shit</i>.</a> Here we go again…</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-escape-from-monkey-island/">LucasArts Time Machine: Escape From Monkey Island</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-escape-from-monkey-island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
