<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scientific Gamer &#187; Curse of Monkey Island</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/tag/curse-of-monkey-island/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>LucasArts Time Machine: The Curse Of Monkey Island</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/</link>
		<comments>https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curse of Monkey Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Praise Of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lucasarts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lucasarts time machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkey island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=6622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And so, after a rather longer period than I anticipated, we come back to the beginning. This whole series was prompted by my booting up Curse Of Monkey Island back in October of last year, and wondering: why was Curse the last high-profile 2D point and click adventure game that LucasArts made? Was the genre [&#8230;]</p><p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/">LucasArts Time Machine: The Curse Of Monkey Island</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_barbery.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6628" title="Some of the iMUSE stuff in this game really has to be experienced to be believed. There are *five* variant tracks for the Barbery Coast, the 'base' one, and then one for each barber pirate, *and* one for Captain Rottingham. And that's just one area!" alt="curse_barbery" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_barbery-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And so, after a rather longer period than I anticipated, we come back to the beginning. <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/tag/lucasarts-time-machine/">This whole series</a> was prompted by my booting up <i>Curse Of Monkey Island</i> back in October of last year, and wondering: why was <i>Curse</i> the last high-profile 2D point and click adventure game that LucasArts made? Was the genre an evolutionary dead-end? Was the lure of 3D graphics &#8212; which were exploding in 1997 thanks to the Voodoo accelerator card &#8212; too strong to resist? And considering <i>Curse</i> in particular, I wanted to get a bit more context on just why LucasArts had abandoned their previously wildly-successful genre at precisely the moment they’d managed to usher it to its apotheosis &#8212; because <i>Curse</i> is absolutely <i>fantastic</i>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-6622"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">My (admittedly hazy) recollection is that this wasn’t exactly a popular opinion to have at the time. Said popular opinion tended to rank <i>Curse</i> in a distant third place behind the first two <i>Monkey Island</i> games, and one of the things I do definitely remember is a certain amount of griping from the gaming media that the 2D graphics made it look old-fashioned; 1997 was around about the time when everything was making the jump to 3D whether it was a good idea or not, and so <i>Curse</i> sticking to its guns was seen by some as an unforgivably antiquated approach. The big irony is that now, in 2021, if you stick <i>Curse</i> next to any 3D game that was released in 1997, the 3D game will be a mess of jagged edges and pixelated textures while <i>Curse</i> hasn’t aged a single day. It remains absolutely the best-looking adventure game ever made; even the modern adventure game renaissance hasn’t managed to produce anything that matches the colourful, stylised art and animation of <i>Curse</i>. If you’ve played the previous <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i> games it <i>is</i> a bit of an adjustment to see the previously regular-sized Guybrush Threepwood transformed into a lanky giant, and the fact that everything is made out of cartoonish curves &#8212; I don’t think there’s a single straight line in the game &#8212; also takes a bit of getting used to. I thought <i>Curse</i> was a <i>weird</i> looking game back in 1997, but time has proven the value of its art direction.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_duel.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6629" title="The humour is also smarter about what it's satirising or parodying than MI2 was -- this banjo scene is a pisstake of the one from Deliverance, but it's still funny without having seen the film to get the reference." alt="curse_duel" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_duel-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The technical advances made to allow the SCUMM engine to take advantage of better technology are also impressive. Starting from <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-indiana-jones-and-the-last-crusade/"><i>Last Crusade</i></a> in 1989 and going all the way through to <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-the-dig/"><i>The Dig</i></a> in 1997, it’s obvious that all of LucasArts’ adventure games were based on the same engine; they (mostly) all use the same font and the same mouse cursor, and while the later games improved on the art and animation and experimented with the interface it never diverged so much that the game was unrecognisable as a SCUMM game. Even in <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-full-throttle/"><i>Full Throttle</i></a>, which spliced in a whole other game engine from <i>Rebel Assault</i> to do its on-rails motorbike bits, it was easy to see which parts of the game were driven by SCUMM and which were not.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But while <i>Curse</i> doesn’t jettison SCUMM convention entirely, keeping the conversation interface and the coloured subtitle text that indicates who is speaking, it’s otherwise impossible to tell that it’s running on the same base technology as all of the other LucasArts games. It’s the first (and only) LucasArts adventure designed to run at a resolution of 640&#215;480 &#8212; this sounds laughable today, but it represents a near-doubling of the number of pixels<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-6622-1' id='fnref-6622-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(6622)'>1</a></sup> on the screen, allowing for <i>much</i> richer environments, backgrounds and animation detail. I love the classic pixel art of <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-loom/"><i>Loom</i></a> and <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-the-secret-of-monkey-island/"><i>Secret of Monkey Island</i></a>, which did so much with so little to work with, but <i>The Dig</i> pushed that art style about as far as it could go and <i>Curse</i> is a quantum leap forward that would have changed the entire 2D adventure game genre if it hadn’t died about two seconds after it was released. The iMUSE dynamic music system has been beefed up to work with Michael Land’s brilliant CD-quality soundtrack (see the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f556u4K0ijc">Puerto Pollo theme</a> and the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJHwDDTMf7U">Barbery Coast theme</a> for two of the standout tracks… look, just go and listen to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wPWFWUsPBw">the entire thing</a>, you’ll thank me later) and the truly ridiculous amount of voiced dialogue meant that <i>Curse</i> was also the first LucasArts adventure game to ship on two CDs rather than one. Unlike a lot of prior efforts which threw in pre-rendered videos and voice tracks just because they had the storage space going spare, <i>Curse</i> actually <i>needed</i> all of it.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_fandango.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6630" title="When you have a chance to both advertise your upcoming game and make a callback to an old one in the same joke, you take it." alt="curse_fandango" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_fandango-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Speaking of voice acting, this was the first thing that jumped out at me on getting past the introduction and into <i>Curse</i> proper. At this point LucasArts had been fully voicing their games for several years starting with <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-day-of-the-tentacle/"><i>Day of the Tentacle</i></a> in 1993; the novelty has long worn off, so I wasn’t expecting <i>Curse</i> to make much of an impression on me in that regard. However, I was not prepared for just how <i>much</i> of it there was. <i>Curse</i> has more conversation options &#8212; and thus more voice acting &#8212; by about a full order of magnitude compared to prior LucasArts games. It’s a dramatic change in approach compared to <i>Full Throttle </i>and <i>The Dig</i>, which went to great lengths to stop you from talking to anyone and whose conversation systems were largely functional gameplay mechanisms with a few jokes scattered around the edges. <i>Curse</i> instead views its conversation interface and voice responses as the primary delivery mechanism for its humour, and so it hits you with joke after joke after joke. There are characters in this game where one conversation option with them advances the storyline and the other four lead to sub-trees of nothing but jokes. And the jokes are actually good! Sure, there’s the occasional line that falls flat on its face, and whether others land depends on how much you enjoy terrible pirate puns, but I think <i>Curse</i>’s hit rate is higher than any other LucasArts game outside of the original <i>Monkey Island</i> and <i>Day of the Tentacle</i>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(A good example of just how ridiculously in-depth <i>Curse</i>’s voice acting is can be found in the theatre in Puerto Pollo. Guybrush can barge into the theatre while the actors are rehearsing to hear a selection of gloriously awful jokes mashing up classical plays with braindead modern entertainment trends. Most games would record one or two lines for this and then switch to a generic “sod off” response from the actors as they get tired of Guybrush’s constant intrusions. Not <i>Curse</i>, though; <i>Curse</i> has fifteen or twenty of the things that you can cycle through in succession, and then when the game is finally out of jokes it switches to a procedurally-generated set that, while admittedly not very good, is <i>still</i> far more effort than I expected them to put in to a location that other games would treat as an afterthought. Because who is going to see this? Who is going to actually go to the trouble of cycling through all that dialogue for no gameplay benefit? <i>Curse</i> dedicating so much effort to making the player laugh is a development philosophy that’s entirely at odds with modern achievement-driven game design, which is why it’s also a very refreshing thing to experience in 2021.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_shatner.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6624" title="The Shatner impression was something that was *definitely* lost on me the last time I played this. I feel like Curse is a game that rewards repeat playthroughs at regular intervals so that you can catch new jokes in the nooks and crannies that you didn't get before." alt="curse_shatner" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_shatner-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The clever writing is also helped along tremendously by Dominic Armato’s performance as Guybrush. In a game so stuffed full of dialogue, where the main character is providing one half of every conversation and is <i>also</i> giving wry, self-aware commentary on everything that he’s doing, it would be easy for Guybrush to seem smug, grating and/or tiresome, a little like Boston Low eventually did in <i>The Dig</i>. It’s largely thanks to Armato that he does not, and there’s also many jokes that rely primarily on his voice acting talents in order to sell them, like El Pollo Diablo or the excellent segue into a William Shatner impression when he’s reading from the ventriloquy guide. The rest of the voice acting in <i>Curse</i> is extremely high-quality &#8212; the Barbery Coast pirates are astonishingly good &#8212; but even so Armato manages to stand out with a performance that literally defined the character; it’s unsurprising that he went on to spend a large portion of the next fifteen years voicing Guybrush, because it’s impossible to imagine anyone else doing it now.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">From an actual mechanical perspective, though, it’s interesting that despite LucasArts having voiced their games for nearly half a decade now, <i>Curse</i> is the first one to leverage its voice acting as an informal hint system. If you use the wrong item on the wrong object in any previous LucasArts adventure game, you get a pretty generic response from the protagonist: “That won’t work.” or “I can’t do that.” or in <i>Full Throttle</i>’s case “I’m not putting my lips on that!” This was mostly a historical compromise forced on LucasArts because they didn’t have the resources to write and then voice unique lines for every interaction, although there’s also the factor that this wouldn’t have seemed like the wrong thing to do at the time because it had never been done differently. Thanks to its vastly increased quantity of voice acting lines, though, <i>Curse</i> can afford to be much more specific. For example, early on in the game you pick up a pair of scissors, and a little later on you run across a sawhorse-type thing supporting a barrel of gunpowder. You need to move the gunpowder barrel to another location by rolling it, but it’s held firmly in place by the sawhorse, so the next logical step is to try and saw the sawhorse to bits. At this point in the story the only sharp item you have in your inventory is a small pair of scissors, but thanks to the series’ prior record of Adventure Game Logic (hello, monkey wrench puzzle) it’s possible that these might still do the job. So you try using the scissors on the sawhorse, but instead of that generic “I can’t do that” line, Guybrush instead responds with “I can’t saw the sawhorse with scissors!” Okay, great! That means I must be able to saw it with <i>something</i>, and that I’m on the right track here; I just need to find the right item.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_quicksand.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6623" title="No shots of the screen-blocking inventory, but it does feel like a step back from The Dig's transparent version." alt="curse_quicksand" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_quicksand-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These special hint voice lines aren’t in place for every possible interaction, but they exist for enough of them that the impact of <i>Curse</i>’s at-times utterly obtuse puzzles is softened to the point where they are bearable. Coming to it 24 years later, I think the puzzle design is definitely the weakest link in a game that’s otherwise got stellar production values across the board. That is not to say that they are <i>bad</i> &#8212; by the standards of this series alone <i>Curse</i> still ranks in the top fifty percent for puzzle consistency, and if we widen the comparison out to its mid-90s genre contemporaries it’s a shining paragon of internal logic. It does feel a bit too variable, though, with a few too many puzzles where 90% of the steps make perfect sense and then the remaining 10% were designed by an alien or something. Particularly enraging puzzles this time around were using the magic wand on the top hat to get the ventriloquy book &#8212; this is especially awful because the top hat is just another prop that’s camouflaged in a backstage room in the theatre that’s absolutely full of props &#8212; and catapulting the corpse of the groom through the hole in the wall. This latter one is pretty emblematic of <i>Curse</i>’s bad puzzle design habits; you can see that there’s a boarded-up hole in the wall that you can pry the boards off of, and you can see that the groom’s skeleton is on top of one of those spring-driven beds that folds away into the wall, which is nailed down to the floor. Removing the nails is another obvious interaction (once you have the crowbar, anyway), but what’s not obvious at any point of this process is <i>why</i> you are doing this; the eventual outcome is so cartoonish that there’s no possible way to predict it before you do it.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Fortunately those puzzles are in the minority. While the puzzle design in general might be nowhere near as elegant as the ones in <i>Secret of Monkey Island</i> or <i>Day of the Tentacle</i>, and while I had significantly more trouble with the back half of the game on Blood Island, which I remember far less well than the opening episodes in Puerto Pollo, I only had to resort to a walkthrough twice. And to be completely fair to <i>Curse</i>, while the logical aspects of its puzzle design can be a bit lumpy that’s usually because it is (once again) using them as an excuse for some absolutely cracking jokes, which is a tradeoff that I’m willing to accept as long as it doesn’t completely compromise the game the way it did in <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-sam-max-hit-the-road/"><i>Sam &amp; Max</i></a>. I was very happy to see the return of inventory humour with the python/quicksand puzzle (it last appeared in <i>Day of the Tentacle</i>), and there’s an absolutely brilliant meta-joke where Guybrush drinks what is essentially poison to get interred in the Goodsoup family crypt. He passes out in the hotel bar, and “SOME TIME LATER&#8230;” the gravekeeper turns up and comments on how he thought you couldn’t die in LucasArts adventure games. “Perhaps they’re trying something different”, drawls the bartender, and so Guybrush is duly hauled away and dumped inside the crypt; the credits start to roll, complete with a “You scored 0 out of 800 points” riff on Sierra adventure game death screens, and get a surprisingly long way before Guybrush loudly interjects that he isn’t dead. Just like the original <i>Monkey Island</i>, <i>Curse </i>is at its best when it’s taking the piss out of adventure game tropes; it takes a lot of finesse to accomplish this without falling victim to the same bad design it’s supposed to be mocking, but <i>Curse</i> just about<i> </i>manages to successfully thread that needle.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_relapse.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6627" title="I knew about the death joke, but I'd forgotten that you have to do it twice and this line caught me completely off-guard. Absolutely perfect delivery." alt="curse_relapse" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_relapse-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I haven’t really talked about <i>Curse</i>’s plot or story structure yet, and I suppose I should even though I see it as somewhat irrelevant &#8212; the story is there largely as a framework to hang the pirate barbershop quartets and lactose-intolerant volcano gods off of rather than existing in its own right as an actual coherent thing. <i>Curse</i> starts a little while after <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-monkey-island-2/"><i>Monkey Island 2</i></a>’s infamously bad theme park ending, with a bit of hand-waving narration from Guybrush as to how he escaped and ended up adrift in the middle of the Caribbean. He washes up on Plunder Island, where his girlfriend Elaine is conveniently governor but who not-so-conveniently gets transformed into a solid gold statue after Guybrush gives her a cursed diamond ring. The voodoo priestess (another source of great meta-jokes about the series) tells him that the only way to break the curse is to replace the ring with an uncursed one of equal or greater value, and Guybrush quickly discovers that there’s one on Blood Island. So step one of his quest is to find a ship, a crew and a map to Blood Island; step two is to retrieve Elaine (who is stolen by pirates shortly after the game starts); and step three is to sail to Blood Island and find the uncursed diamond ring.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><i>Curse</i> is technically split into six acts, but most of the game’s content is found in just two of them, the Plunder Island and Blood Island segments. It unfortunately makes the mistake of frontloading most of its best content; I understand the value of making a good first impression on the player, but Plunder Island is so much better than Blood Island that it feels like a significant comedown once you leave the former and get to the latter. This isn’t because Blood Island is <i>bad</i> &#8212; it’s got a decent number of its own standout moments &#8212; but rather that Plunder Island is the bit of <i>Curse</i> that you can put up against any other adventure game in existence, including the original <i>Monkey Island</i>, and it’ll probably come off best. It is absolutely <i>superb</i>, stuffed end to end with memorable characters, excellent jokes and fantastic music, and there’s only one or two duff puzzles in the whole act. Things noticeably and immediately drop in quality the moment you leave, not least because…</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><i>&#8230;ugh…</i></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_swordfighting.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6625" title="Please god, release me from this hell." alt="curse_swordfighting" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_swordfighting-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8230;we’re doing Insult Swordfighting again. Act 3 is the insult swordfighting act that has you sailing around the Caribbean fighting other pirates (complete with <i>Pirates!</i>-lite ship vs ship combat) so that you can upgrade both your ship and your insult repertoire to the point where you can take on the big boss who has the map to Blood Island. The insults and responses are rhyme-based now, but otherwise this act is identical to the insult swordfighting segment of <i>Monkey Island 1</i>, which was funny for about seven seconds back in 1990 and then merely incredibly, unbearably tiresome every time I encountered it after that. You can imagine how overjoyed I was to be asked to repeat the process for a full twenty minutes in <i>Curse</i>. (And honestly, it’s a mercy it’s as short as that.) This isn’t even a reference or a callback, it’s just the same joke repeated over and over again like a bad fucking catchphrase, which is something that <i>Curse</i>, for all of its series meta-humour, is otherwise remarkably good at avoiding. I wouldn’t give up the start of Act 3 for the world because <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9bXjttMxKY">it’s one of the best sequences in the game</a>, but I could <i>really</i> do without the rest of it.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The game does pick up again once Guybrush gets to Blood Island, although it can’t match the highs of Plunder Island. Blood Island’s strengths are its astonishingly lovely artwork &#8212; just like Melee Island in <i>Monkey</i><i> Island 1</i> and Scabb Island in <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i><i> 2</i> it’s perpetually shrouded in night, which lets the art team do some incredible things with the lighting and colour palette &#8212; and a few excellent set-piece jokes. Its weakness is that it’s less goal-oriented than the Plunder Island section of the game, which split its objectives up into a series of manageable tasks and puzzles; Blood Island on the other hand has one objective &#8212; get the uncursed diamond ring &#8212; but your route towards it isn’t always clear and sometimes becomes so murky you end up going in circles for far longer than you really should. Regardless, it’s a perfectly good chunk of adventure game that only looks bad because it’s sat next to the much better Plunder Island segment. I know this because <i>Curse</i>’s finale comes perilously close to being almost as much of a wet fart as <i>Monkey Island 2</i>’s was, and while it is mercifully short enough that it doesn’t drag the rest of the game down (the puzzles here are so simple that you can be done with it in just ten minutes) it still serves as a timely reminder that things could always be much, much worse.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_terrible.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6626" title="A shame that Curse ends with a trip to the toilet, but it at least signs off on a better note than MI2 did." alt="curse_terrible" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_terrible-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Still, this unevenness is something of a series tradition by this point; no game should try to emulate the confused, meandering structure of <i>Monkey</i><i> Island 2</i>, but even <i>Monkey</i><i> Island</i><i> 1</i> had a back half that was noticeably weaker than its front half. <i>Curse </i>falls somewhere in the middle, in that the majority of its content is rock solid but it occasionally feels the need to bamboozle the player with cartoon logic and take inexplicable detours away from the fun adventure game stuff into boring minigames and railroaded gameplay. Its standout features are its art, animation, music, voice acting and writing; that the actual puzzles are a little hit and miss only detracts slightly from how fantastic <i>Curse</i> is as an experience. I don’t think we’ll ever see a 2D adventure game with these production values ever again, because the modern genre is the preserve of small indie studios who don’t have anywhere near the resources required to pull it off. It needed a big budget studio like LucasArts, who had been making these things for ten years and whose development staff was at the top of their game in almost every single respect.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And that also answers the question I had a year ago, when I started this series: why did the 2D adventure game genre die out shortly after it produced what was arguably its finest game? Coming at that problem from 2020 it wasn’t immediately obvious, but now that I see <i>Curse</i> with the perspective granted from playing through the previous decade of LucasArts adventures the answer is pretty clear. <i>Curse of Monkey Island</i> goes above and beyond everything that came before it, but this came at a cost; the original <i>Monkey Island</i> was developed by a core team of around twelve people, but the credits for <i>Curse</i> list over seventy (the art team alone has ballooned from three people to twenty-four) and this is completely ignoring the voice actors and corporate support staff necessary for a company of the size of LucasArts in 1997. <i>Curse</i> did not sell well at all &#8212; 300,000 copies doesn’t sound all that bad until you remember that <i>Full Throttle</i> sold over a million  &#8212; but even if it had, could it have sold well enough to justify such a large development team? I don’t think so. By the mid-to-late ‘90s game development was becoming increasingly corporate, and one thing corporations are very keen on is favourable return on investment<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-6622-2' id='fnref-6622-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(6622)'>2</a></sup>. Unfortunately by 1997 the cost of the development resources required to make an adventure game was starting to outweigh the amount of money made back from sales, and the market only continued to shrink after this &#8212; <i>Grim Fandango</i> sold even more poorly than <i>Curse</i>, indicating that perhaps the problem wasn’t with 3D accelerators after all.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_volcano.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6631" title="Curse even has an educational quality to it: it taught me what tofu was." alt="curse_volcano" src="https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/curse_volcano-580x435.png" width="580" height="435" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So while <i>Curse</i> was far from a dead end in evolutionary terms, in terms of the market and the cold, hard financial truth that lies behind every video game it definitely was. You can’t make a game like <i>Curse</i> and also make money at the same time. Even today, in 2021, you probably still can’t. All of the things that so impressed me about <i>Curse</i>, like the vast quantity of throwaway jokes and voice lines, are also precisely the sort of things that would make anyone in charge of financing a game wince slightly before scrawling “REJECTED” across whatever formal paperwork was attached to their greenlight process. If the big-budget adventure game genre had to die, though, then I’m glad we at least got <i>Curse of Monkey Island</i> out of it before it shuffled off this mortal coil; whether it is the best adventure game ever made is debatable, but it <i>is</i> unarguably the best-looking, the best-sounding and the best-written one out there.</p>
<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-6622'>
<div class='footnotedivider'></div>
<ol>
<li id='fn-6622-1'>It’s difficult to tell because ScummVM corrects for it so flawlessly, but I <i>think</i> <i>The Dig</i> and <i>Full Throttle</i> are running at 480&#215;360. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-6622-1'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
<li id='fn-6622-2'>Activision are currently pursuing this philosophy to an almost psychotic degree, with all of their internal studios save for King and Blizzard working on <i>Call of Duty</i> now; the sad truth is that putting a developer on <i>CoD</i> makes them significantly more money than if they put the same developer on <i>Crash </i>or <i>Spyro</i>. Of course this means that if <i>CoD</i> ever crashes and burns Activision is going to be completely screwed, but that’s very unlikely to happen any time soon. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-6622-2'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
</ol>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/">LucasArts Time Machine: The Curse Of Monkey Island</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://scientificgamer.com/lucasarts-time-machine-curse-of-monkey-island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Soundtracks.</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/sunday-soundtracks-2/</link>
		<comments>https://scientificgamer.com/sunday-soundtracks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curse of Monkey Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Soundtracks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Curse of Monkey Island.</p><p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/sunday-soundtracks-2/">Sunday Soundtracks.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg9CykFiD3U&amp;feature=bf_prev&amp;list=PL13536210EC01A50C&amp;lf=results_main">Curse of Monkey Island.</a></p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='580' height='357' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/MZzPZA8VFas?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scientificgamer.com/sunday-soundtracks-2/">Sunday Soundtracks.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scientificgamer.com">The Scientific Gamer</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://scientificgamer.com/sunday-soundtracks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
