<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Reflection</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilitarist</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ilitarist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep it up. You&#039;re doing a fine job writing clever things about dumb games.

And in case you&#039;d want to check something you&#039;ve missed - check Total War Attila. You forced me to return to Total War with your kind words about Total War War Warhammer, but I like historical settings and Attila is the first time Total War seems to work to me at all. Because even Rome 1 didn&#039;t work properly. It still has problems with prevalence of autoresolve starting with mid game but it&#039;s greatest historical Total War and it makes me very optimistic about trying War Warhammer when they finish working on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep it up. You&#8217;re doing a fine job writing clever things about dumb games.</p>
<p>And in case you&#8217;d want to check something you&#8217;ve missed &#8211; check Total War Attila. You forced me to return to Total War with your kind words about Total War War Warhammer, but I like historical settings and Attila is the first time Total War seems to work to me at all. Because even Rome 1 didn&#8217;t work properly. It still has problems with prevalence of autoresolve starting with mid game but it&#8217;s greatest historical Total War and it makes me very optimistic about trying War Warhammer when they finish working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 86</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude! Long-time fan, first-time commenter.

About two years ago, I stumbled on your blog and read through your entire archive chronologically. It was great fun to see the evolution in your writing style (remember how you used to be a bit self-conscious about it? Your wordsmithing has really leveled up; you&#039;re better at this than lots of people who get paid for it) and your methodical analyses of every topic you tackle have always been a delight to read.

Part of life is accepting that good things come to an end eventually, but I&#039;ll keep enjoying what you put out as long as you&#039;re interested in doing so. It&#039;s not surprising to see you&#039;ve put so much effective thought into how you will keep your motivation up, and I say cheers to that!

There&#039;s just one thing I have to voice my opinion on: consideration and empathy are essential and respectable qualities, but is it realistic to expect they can be scaleably expressed through providing super-quick responses to Internet comments? You&#039;re just one guy deciding to take on the posting schedules of people from all over the world. I&#039;d say don&#039;t promise to shackle yourself like that; you may grow to resent it. From everything I&#039;ve seen of your readership, I think they&#039;ll understand.

Far be it from me to kneecap your resolution with pessimism! I just wanted to chime in with that... while letting you know your work is always more appreciated than you think, and will be for as long as you choose to produce it. Thanks for another year of fun reads!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude! Long-time fan, first-time commenter.</p>
<p>About two years ago, I stumbled on your blog and read through your entire archive chronologically. It was great fun to see the evolution in your writing style (remember how you used to be a bit self-conscious about it? Your wordsmithing has really leveled up; you&#8217;re better at this than lots of people who get paid for it) and your methodical analyses of every topic you tackle have always been a delight to read.</p>
<p>Part of life is accepting that good things come to an end eventually, but I&#8217;ll keep enjoying what you put out as long as you&#8217;re interested in doing so. It&#8217;s not surprising to see you&#8217;ve put so much effective thought into how you will keep your motivation up, and I say cheers to that!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just one thing I have to voice my opinion on: consideration and empathy are essential and respectable qualities, but is it realistic to expect they can be scaleably expressed through providing super-quick responses to Internet comments? You&#8217;re just one guy deciding to take on the posting schedules of people from all over the world. I&#8217;d say don&#8217;t promise to shackle yourself like that; you may grow to resent it. From everything I&#8217;ve seen of your readership, I think they&#8217;ll understand.</p>
<p>Far be it from me to kneecap your resolution with pessimism! I just wanted to chime in with that&#8230; while letting you know your work is always more appreciated than you think, and will be for as long as you choose to produce it. Thanks for another year of fun reads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I&#039;m looking forward to writing them! Even if they are going to be more demanding on my time. I&#039;ll just have to watch less Netflix this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m looking forward to writing them! Even if they are going to be more demanding on my time. I&#8217;ll just have to watch less Netflix this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Zekiel! While I&#039;d likely continue writing even if there was nobody reading, it&#039;s always nice to read comments like these and know I&#039;m not shouting into the void. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Zekiel! While I&#8217;d likely continue writing even if there was nobody reading, it&#8217;s always nice to read comments like these and know I&#8217;m not shouting into the void. <img src='https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some science, anyway. I&#039;ve been building up a list of ideas for posts over the last year so hopefully it shouldn&#039;t be too hard to work up some inspiration for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some science, anyway. I&#8217;ve been building up a list of ideas for posts over the last year so hopefully it shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to work up some inspiration for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zekiel</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zekiel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Hentzau! I&#039;m a lurker but I really appreciate reading your reviews (and the science posts in the archive). And more practically I&#039;m grateful to read whatever you&#039;re happy to write at whatever level of output is sustainable for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Hentzau! I&#8217;m a lurker but I really appreciate reading your reviews (and the science posts in the archive). And more practically I&#8217;m grateful to read whatever you&#8217;re happy to write at whatever level of output is sustainable for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifeofzenith</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lifeofzenith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am looking forward to reading those articles! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking forward to reading those articles! <img src='https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oli Hutt</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/some-reflection/#comment-34347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli Hutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.com/?p=5223#comment-34347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More Science! Yeeeeessss]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Science! Yeeeeessss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
