<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Words Are Backed By Nuclear Weapons!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thermonuclear Bombs. The Scientific Gamer</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thermonuclear Bombs. The Scientific Gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I said I’d talk about thermonuclear weapons at some point. We have now reached it. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I said I’d talk about thermonuclear weapons at some point. We have now reached it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t even tell what&#039;s going on there but that looks nothing like a functioning nuclear bomb design. Honestly I don&#039;t know why Bond was so worried.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t even tell what&#8217;s going on there but that looks nothing like a functioning nuclear bomb design. Honestly I don&#8217;t know why Bond was so worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smurf</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smurf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh god, I just went back to the youtube tab to close it and saw that the nuclear bomb is running on Windows CE. &gt;_&lt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh god, I just went back to the youtube tab to close it and saw that the nuclear bomb is running on Windows CE. &gt;_&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smurf</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smurf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may well be misremembering the exact details but I&#039;m fairly sure that there&#039;s at least one half of a sphere but it&#039;s been so long and it&#039;s such a terrible film I refuse to watch it again to find out.

Actually youtube should be able to save the day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ4dJVHYWDU about 2 minutes in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may well be misremembering the exact details but I&#8217;m fairly sure that there&#8217;s at least one half of a sphere but it&#8217;s been so long and it&#8217;s such a terrible film I refuse to watch it again to find out.</p>
<p>Actually youtube should be able to save the day.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ4dJVHYWDU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ4dJVHYWDU</a> about 2 minutes in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assuming that&#039;s weapons grade stuff and the two spheres are supposed to constitute a critical mass, transporting them both in the same suitcase would be *extremely* hazardous since if they accidentally came together they&#039;d cause a criticality incident.

Also using two halves in two different bombs wouldn&#039;t work. You see that gun-type design up there? The one with the hollow cylinder being fired at the smaller solid one? The total mass of both bits together is just over two critical masses. The hollow cylinder is therefore larger than one critical mass. It doesn&#039;t go critical, though, because it&#039;s a hollow cylinder rather than a sphere and it&#039;s got lots of surface area to lose neutrons. The same applies for chopping a uranium sphere in half; doesn&#039;t matter if the original sphere was two critical masses, changing the shape of the thing means that the criticality threshold for any non-sphere shape increases. So unless they specifically remould the half-sphere into a smaller sphere and then use it in an implosion design (and if they could do that then they wouldn&#039;t need to purchase illicit uranium supplies anyway, because they&#039;d either be dead or working for a governmental agency) it&#039;s just not going to happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming that&#8217;s weapons grade stuff and the two spheres are supposed to constitute a critical mass, transporting them both in the same suitcase would be *extremely* hazardous since if they accidentally came together they&#8217;d cause a criticality incident.</p>
<p>Also using two halves in two different bombs wouldn&#8217;t work. You see that gun-type design up there? The one with the hollow cylinder being fired at the smaller solid one? The total mass of both bits together is just over two critical masses. The hollow cylinder is therefore larger than one critical mass. It doesn&#8217;t go critical, though, because it&#8217;s a hollow cylinder rather than a sphere and it&#8217;s got lots of surface area to lose neutrons. The same applies for chopping a uranium sphere in half; doesn&#8217;t matter if the original sphere was two critical masses, changing the shape of the thing means that the criticality threshold for any non-sphere shape increases. So unless they specifically remould the half-sphere into a smaller sphere and then use it in an implosion design (and if they could do that then they wouldn&#8217;t need to purchase illicit uranium supplies anyway, because they&#8217;d either be dead or working for a governmental agency) it&#8217;s just not going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smurf</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smurf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t for the life of me remember the films this is in.  I think it might be The World Is Not Enough actually.  I&#039;m sure they use the two halves in two different bombs.

So I guess that&#039;s not right then, huh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t for the life of me remember the films this is in.  I think it might be The World Is Not Enough actually.  I&#8217;m sure they use the two halves in two different bombs.</p>
<p>So I guess that&#8217;s not right then, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two halves of a sphere? In the *same* suitcase? That&#039;s. Uh. Yeah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two halves of a sphere? In the *same* suitcase? That&#8217;s. Uh. Yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smurf</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smurf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The most efficient shape for a critical mass is a sphere&quot;

I was going to ask why in movies when they get their uranium out of a padded suitcase it&#039;s always shaped in two halves of a sphere but you&#039;ve only gone and answered that bit.  Is this a rare case of films getting things right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The most efficient shape for a critical mass is a sphere&#8221;</p>
<p>I was going to ask why in movies when they get their uranium out of a padded suitcase it&#8217;s always shaped in two halves of a sphere but you&#8217;ve only gone and answered that bit.  Is this a rare case of films getting things right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feet</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/our-words-are-backed-by-nuclear-weapons/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1840#comment-724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INTERESTING 

*makes notes*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INTERESTING </p>
<p>*makes notes*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
