<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lorentz Contraction And The Ladder Paradox.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/#comment-15858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1537#comment-15858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats wy you will remain a smurf and never become a giant]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats wy you will remain a smurf and never become a giant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1537#comment-595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I demand you make it so this happens. Demand it. Science must answer to me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I demand you make it so this happens. Demand it. Science must answer to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smurf</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smurf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1537#comment-594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until I see you running a ladder through a garage at light speed I refuse to believe any of this is true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until I see you running a ladder through a garage at light speed I refuse to believe any of this is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1537#comment-593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No. Thought experiments are thought experiments for two reasons: 1) To make the concepts they describe easy to understand, 2) Because no practical method of carrying out the thought experiment in the real world exists. We can indirectly observe the results of supernova, the  behaviour of light, subatomic particle reactions etc. and see the hand of special relativity there, but it&#039;s mostly not something you can look at in the way described above.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity has a good summary of technical verifications of special relativity in the laboratory, but we don&#039;t run ladders through garages at light speed. Sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. Thought experiments are thought experiments for two reasons: 1) To make the concepts they describe easy to understand, 2) Because no practical method of carrying out the thought experiment in the real world exists. We can indirectly observe the results of supernova, the  behaviour of light, subatomic particle reactions etc. and see the hand of special relativity there, but it&#8217;s mostly not something you can look at in the way described above.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity</a> has a good summary of technical verifications of special relativity in the laboratory, but we don&#8217;t run ladders through garages at light speed. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/lorentz-contraction-and-the-ladder-paradox/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=1537#comment-592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the thought experiments and I get what is going on. I do thoroughly understand it conceptually and theoretically...

But is there a good example that may be readily available to a casual individual to observe? As in, can the train thing be done in real life and is it something that would be obvious (or obvious when pointed out or whatever) to us?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the thought experiments and I get what is going on. I do thoroughly understand it conceptually and theoretically&#8230;</p>
<p>But is there a good example that may be readily available to a casual individual to observe? As in, can the train thing be done in real life and is it something that would be obvious (or obvious when pointed out or whatever) to us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
