<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battling Boardom: Deck Builders, Part Two.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Were you around for my amazing Catan tantrum? If you didn&#039;t see that you might not understand how I react to games of chance. ¬_¬]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you around for my amazing Catan tantrum? If you didn&#8217;t see that you might not understand how I react to games of chance. ¬_¬</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innokenti</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[innokenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you are being perhaps a touch unfair on Quarriors. I mean, it&#039;s a heavily flawed game, but at least it imparts a modicum of enjoyment. It can be entertaining to roll dice once or twice.

Do need to check out Thunderstone. Looks very appealing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are being perhaps a touch unfair on Quarriors. I mean, it&#8217;s a heavily flawed game, but at least it imparts a modicum of enjoyment. It can be entertaining to roll dice once or twice.</p>
<p>Do need to check out Thunderstone. Looks very appealing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivavirago</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vivavirago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AH. AH. AH.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH. AH. AH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aosher</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aosher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vulko has the baddest of asses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vulko has the baddest of asses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hentzau</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hentzau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have now corrected this heinous oversight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have now corrected this heinous oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivavirago</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vivavirago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You forgot Nightfall, which is clearly the best deck-building game!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot Nightfall, which is clearly the best deck-building game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aosher</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-two/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aosher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=407#comment-113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:D at your Quarriors review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='https://scientificgamer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  at your Quarriors review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
