<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battling Boardom: Deck Builders, Part One.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-one/</link>
	<description>Science, gaming, and all things in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.36</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-one/#comment-29400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=347#comment-29400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Race for the Galaxy is not a deck builder. Race for the Galaxy is objectively not a bad game. This review is not objective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Race for the Galaxy is not a deck builder. Race for the Galaxy is objectively not a bad game. This review is not objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battling Boardom: Deck Builders, Part Two. &#171; The Scientific Gamer</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-one/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Battling Boardom: Deck Builders, Part Two. &#171; The Scientific Gamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=347#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Being the second half of a roundup of the various deckbuilding games you can buy these days. First half here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Being the second half of a roundup of the various deckbuilding games you can buy these days. First half here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aosher</title>
		<link>https://scientificgamer.com/battling-boardom-deck-builders-part-one/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aosher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scientificgamer.wordpress.com/?p=347#comment-104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;My breaking point came after the Seaside expansion, when I found myself staring at a game mat with my doubloons on it and thought “What the hell am I doing here?”&lt;/i&gt;

lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My breaking point came after the Seaside expansion, when I found myself staring at a game mat with my doubloons on it and thought “What the hell am I doing here?”</i></p>
<p>lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
